Search Results

1. Relief-Coroner-Position-Profile [docx, 79 KB]

   ...Pathologists · Specialist advisors in cultural, legal, medical or other fields · Other government departments and agencies, such as NEMA, Manatū Hauora Ministry of Health · News media · Mortality Review Committees. Relationships with other bodies responsible for investigating deaths directly or accidents where death has occurred in New Zealand, will include the Independent Police Conduct Authority, Maritime Safety Authority, Civil Aviation Authority and the Transport Accident Investig...

2. Relief Coroner Position Profile [docx, 79 KB]

   ...Pathologists · Specialist advisors in cultural, legal, medical or other fields · Other government departments and agencies, such as NEMA, Manatū Hauora Ministry of Health · News media · Mortality Review Committees. Relationships with other bodies responsible for investigating deaths directly or accidents where death has occurred in New Zealand, will include the Independent Police Conduct Authority, Maritime Safety Authority, Civil Aviation Authority and the Transport Accident Investig...

3. [2024] NZEnvC 062 Gisborne District Council v China Foresty Group New Zealand Company Limited [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...Council at this stage of the proceeding and is untested; (b) they do not object to the application, name of the forest or the names of the Respondents being released, however they want these documents to be accompanied by their memorandum in response to the application. 4 District Court (Access to Court Documents) Rules 2017 [7] Rule 8(1) of the District Court (Access to Court Documents) Rules 2017 stipulates that every person has the right to access the formal court record...

4. BT v US [2023] NZDT 112 (11 May 2023) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...clear overall picture of services not being provided with reasonable care and skill. The documentation provided by the parties suggests that US experienced resourcing and illness issues, however as the supplier of the promised services it was the responsibility of US to ensure that she could deliver what she had promised, and this includes backup plans and resource in case of need. If not, is it just and practicable for the Tribunal to order that US refund $1,500.00 to BT? 9. Sect...

5. MQ v NP [2023] NZDT 352 (7 August 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...while doing so. The allegation is that NP had no good reason to be driving over the property and that he was merely using it to turn his vehicle. 3. NP on the other hand submits that there is no evidence that he was not driving carefully and responsibly and that the dog must have run in front of him. That the dog was not killed but was injured indicates he was not speeding or otherwise negligent in the operation of his vehicle. The cause of the injuries to the dog was it’s being al...

6. NM v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 512 (25 October 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...Links to the terms and conditions were provided by OH in the email exchange with NM. OH then summarised that NM had paid $6,697.62 and he would be refunded $6,406.30, a deduction of $291.32. 7. Then at 7.26am on 14 August 2023, OH emailed NM in response to NM’s comment that the new schedule was not possible and also that NM could not pay the rebooking fee anyway because it was refusing to accept his payment. OH said plainly “if the new schedule does not work for you, you should no...

7. NX v P Ltd [2023] NZDT 212 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...CGA gives a consumer a right of redress against a manufacturer if the goods in question are not of acceptable quality. The criteria for what constitutes “acceptable quality”, which are set out in s 7 of the CGA, are broad. A manufacturer is not responsible if the breach of the guarantee is caused by a third party who is beyond the manufacturer’s control. Is P Ltd liable to compensate NX for the defects in the unit? [8] I accept that the unit in question has the defects that NX d...

8. CQ v DW [2023] NZDT 84 (20 January 2023) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...properties in [community]. In May 2022 CQ served a fencing notice on DW. The notice indicated that CQ wanted to repair the concrete post and wire fence between their properties. It gave an estimated cost of $11,960.00 including GST and proposed that DW be responsible for that cost as he had removed the previously existing fence. DW did not respond to the notice, and after the notice period expired CQ had the fence repaired. 2. CQ brought a claim for $11,960.00 for the cost of the fence...

9. [2023] NZEmpC 194 Watkins v Highmark Homes Ltd [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...Section 219. 6 Almond v Read [2017] NZSC 80, [2017] 1 NZLR 801 at [38]. 7 An Employee v An Employer [2007] ERNZ 295 (EmpC) at [9]–[10]; and Almond v Read, above n 6, at [38]–[39]. Reasons for the delay [8] Mr Halse accepts full responsibility for the delay. In an affidavit, Debra Joy Weatherley-Hull, an employee of CultureSafe Hamilton as its office manager, says that due to workload, travel commitments and other urgent matters, an error was made as to when the stat...

10. 2023-10-18-WK-memo-re-witnesses.pdf [pdf, 156 KB]

    ...issue as noted in Appendix A. (a) Mr Bent has confirmed that he is comfortable providing written questions to those witnesses who are not proposed for cross examination by any of the other parties. (b) the relevant witnesses can then provide responses in writing prior to the close of the hearing. We ask the Court to make directions accordingly. 6. Waka Kotahi and the Prouse Trust Partnership, Mrs Karen Prouse and Mr Stephen Prouse (the Prouse Parties) are at an advanced s...