[2012] NZEmpC 8 Gazeley v Oceania Group (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 126 KB]
...the Authority in its determination - see paragraphs [17] to [27]. I note here, however, one issue raised by Ms Sharma about this part of the Authority’s determination. She submitted that the Authority was wrong to characterise Mrs Gazeley’s response to Oceania’s concerns about her clinical management as “bare denials”. Having regard to the evidence Ms Sharma relied on for that submission, I think there is substance in it, but this does not alter the overall view I have fo...