Search Results

1. [2007] NZEmpC AC 46/07 Eurera-Morrison v New Zealand Post Ltd [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...the opportunity to explain her behaviour and she was strongly encouraged to bring a support person of her choice to the meeting. [18] At the same time Mr Coker wrote to the secretary of the Union to which the plaintiff belonged and received a response advising that Paul Blair would be managing the situation for the union. [19] Mr Taylor completed a report on 17 February which he provided to Mr Coker. Under the heading “Conclusion”, Mr Taylor expressed the following views:...

2. [2007] NZEmpC AC 61/07 Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd v van Heerden [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...entitlement under the CA. [12] Ms Watt continually refined the role and reached a final position as to its requirements, just prior to the selection process. The title was changed to “panel co- ordinator” to reflect the evolving status of the responsibilities. There remained an issue between the parties whether Ms van Heerden’s panel leader role and the new role of panel co-ordinator, were essentially the same, save for the budgetary responsibilities and the ability to hire...

3. [2006] NZEmpC AC 54/06 Yuan Cheng International Investment Group Ltd v Buer [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...the nuances of s66 of the Act. [33] I also observed that in her witness statement to the Authority she stated “The verbal contract discussed was to be a one year term”. Something further must have been said to the Authority, possibly in response to questioning (although I am unable to check this as the Authority is not required to provide a transcript) because the Authority found; “It was also agreed that the contract would be reviewed after 12 months”. [34] Additiona...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 180 Keepa v Go Bus Transport Ltd [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...allegations at this stage were not about relations with customers but the standard of Mr Keepa’s driving and in particular his persistent refusal to carry out instructions to keep both hands on the steering wheel. Once Mr Keepa had completed his responses, Mr Burton adjourned to consider the matter. When he returned he indicated to Mr Keepa and Mr Graham that he was proposing to deal with the first two allegations by way of warnings but termination of employment was in contempla...

5. Moeahu v Winitana - Waiwhetu Pa No 4 (2013) 310 Aotea MB 172 (310 AOT 172) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...decision. Report of KPMG [12] Mr Bell summarised the process he followed in preparing his report and noted that the current chairperson, Mr Moeahu, and another trustee, Mr Puketapu, were interviewed to obtain an understanding of the roles and responsibilities of the trustees and the processes of the trust especially in relation to organising payments. Mr Bell also reviewed financial information of the trust that was in the possession of the Court or the trustees for the period fr...

6. Anderson - Te Raupo (2015) 99 Taitokerau MB 206 (99 TTK 206) [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...restructured. [8] By way of a document entitled Variation of Loan Arrangements Under Tripartite Deed executed on or about 9 December 1997, Wilson Gardner and Deresley Clarke (the occupier of the other house built under the papakainga scheme) took responsibility for the restructured loan of $50,500.00. As I understand it, they each assumed responsibility for half that amount, namely, $25,250.00. The loan was for 20 years. Importantly, the existing tripartite deed was “transferre...

7. Naera v Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 Block (2011) 34 Waiariki MB 151 (34 WAR 151) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...construction and operation of the proposed power scheme on a build operate transfer basis. TLP’s operation of the power generation scheme will last for 14 years from the start date when the power station is commissioned. [13] TLP is fully responsible for all of the tasks referred to including the funding package TLP has agreed to provide a guaranteed upfront payment along with annual payments. The first of the upfront payments has already been made and the second is due to be pa...

8. Rafiq v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2012] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...people to discover other tax-secret information that is normally known only to Inland Revenue staff. 24.2 User IDs were deleted. A user ID is a unique identifier that is assigned to each staff member. It shows (to those who can decipher it) who was responsible for making a particular entry in the computer system. The user IDs were deleted in order to protect the integrity of the tax system. Disclosure of them could increase risks to the security of the computer system, for similar re...

9. Summary of submissions: Regulations to give effect to the new alcohol laws [pdf, 591 KB]

   ...– 6 submissions retail stakeholders (individuals and representative bodies) – 7 submissions other1 – 13 submissions. 6. Submissions ranged from brief emails on specific issues to comprehensive documents containing question-by-question responses to the matters raised in the consultation document. 7. In the public meetings we sought feedback on the options, proposals, and questions in the consultation document. Overall, feedback from meetings aligned with submissions. This ma...

10. O'Reilly v CAC301 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 15 [pdf, 295 KB]

    ...changed and that she was entitled to operate in terms of those 2012 Rules; and [c] the Club as a whole was responsible for compliance with its statutory obligations as an incorporated society, not Ms Buchanan individually. We add that, in fact, that responsibility must have rested with the Committee and/or the Governing Body. [82] Mrs Buchanan acknowledges that Mrs O'Reilly first raised concerns in early May 2013 about the validity of the proposed sale, the application of the 20...