Search Results

1. Fehling v New Zealand Post (Lifting of Stay) [2013] NZHRRT 43 [pdf, 47 KB]

   ...require of Mr Fehling a single brief of evidence setting out chronologically and in as much detail as possible the factual narrative of events and circumstances on which the claim is based. The Tribunal can only act on evidence and it 4 is the responsibility of each party to place before the Tribunal their account of the facts as seen and understood by them. Where any document is to be referred to or relied on, a copy of that document is to be filed also. If Mr Fehling intends cal...

2. M v C LCRO 62 / 2009 (28 May 2009) [pdf, 18 KB]

   ...the matters considered by this office, they do not approach the gravity of the questions considered by the Removal Review Authority or the Residence Review Board in terms of the impact on applicants. Accordingly, a strict approach placing greater responsibilities of compliance on applicants is more justifiable. [16] The provisions of s 198 are stated in mandatory terms and there is no statutory discretion to ameliorate their harshness. The obligation to comply with the procedur...

3. DZ v WA LCRO 199 / 2010 (6 October 2011) [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...was Ms WA (the Practitioner). [2] In sorting out the files the Practitioner perceived that the Complainant had an outstanding debt with Mr VZ for work done but not yet billed. She sent him a bill for $541.50. [3] It was also part of her responsibilities to transfer files to other lawyers. In transferring the Complainant‟s file, the Practitioner also sent him a bill for $112, of which $12 was a disbursement for courier charges. [4] When the Complainant received the acco...

4. I v P LCRO 18 / 2009 (11 February 2009) [pdf, 18 KB]

   ...he provided a large number of supporting documents. Complainant I provided further documents on 28 April 2008. Lawyer P responded to the complaint on 1 May 2008 and also provided some additional documents. Complainant I replied to Lawyer P’s response on 23 May 2008 and provided further documents. Complainant I provided a copy of a letter he wrote to Lawyer P dated 17 June 2008 to the Society and also wrote twice to the Society on 1 July 2008. Lawyer P provided further documents on...

5. Youth Court - 15 point assessment of a youth justice system [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...those in the care system) and which aim to prevent a child ever entering the justice system? Rating: Comments: 2. Minimum and Maximum Ages for Jurisdiction of Children • Does the country/state have an age of criminal responsibility of 12 or higher? • Does the country/state specify for the purpose of criminal proceedings that being treated as an adult begins at 18th birthday? Rating: Comments: 3. Is There A Separate...

6. Pace v Cain - Parish of Manurewa 196 and 197A Section 2B 4 [2017] Māori Appellate Court MB 342 (2017 APPEAL 342) [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...allow the filing of the appeal out of time? Background [4] Parish of Manurewa Lots 196 and 197A Section 2B 4 is Māori freehold land comprising 0.1619 hectares. An ahu whenua trust was constituted over the block on 19 March 1975.2 The sole responsible trustee is Raymond Kett. [5] In 2016 three applications were filed concerning the land:3 (a) to determine the life interest held by Jean Francis Meta; (b) to confirm a resolution of assembled owners to sell the block to Jodi Cai...

7. BORA Fiordland Marine Management Bill [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...all resources. 16. Therefore resources must be managed for use, development and protection, with a requirement to meet the needs of future generations.5 We consider this to be an important and significant objective. Rational and proportionate response 17. Activities within the marine environment are subject to a number of regulatory controls that are imposed with the aim of preserving the environment and preserving resources. The restrictions on the collection and harvesting of...

8. Auckland Transport 156 [PDF, 64 KB]

   ...the following proceedings: (a) ENV-2017-AKL-000156 C N Barbour Family Trust v Auckland Council 2. Auckland Transport is a person who has an interest in the proceedings that is greater than the interest that the general public has, as it is responsible for local traffic and transport infrastructure and services forming part of the Auckland transport system as set out in the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009, and the Local Government Act 1974. Auckland Transport is th...

9. Auckland Transport 232 [PDF, 64 KB]

   ...party to the following proceedings: (a) ENV-2016-AKL-000232 Bunnings Limited v Auckland Council 2. Auckland Transport is a person who has an interest in the proceedings that is greater than the interest that the general public has, as it is responsible for local traffic and transport infrastructure and services forming part of the Auckland transport system as set out in the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009, and the Local Government Act 1974. Auckland Transport is the...

10. Auckland Tranport 155 [PDF, 64 KB]

    ...following proceedings: (a) ENV-2017-AKL-000155 National Trading Company Limited v Auckland Council 2. Auckland Transport is a person who has an interest in the proceedings that is greater than the interest that the general public has, as it is responsible for local traffic and transport infrastructure and services forming part of the Auckland transport system as set out in the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009, and the Local Government Act 1974. Auckland Transport i...