Search Results

1. IO v AU LCRO 140 / 2011 (17 April 2012) [pdf, 61 KB]

   ...the Practitioner that he and his family “were relocating to Australia due to work/study reasons” and that the Practitioner “was supportive of this and informed us this would not disadvantage the progress of the application”. [7] In his response, the Practitioner outlined the practical and legal difficulties arising from the niece living in Pakistan and the consequences of the Applicant moving to Australia. He stated that in March 2010 the Applicant and a friend attended at hi...

2. MC v AD LCRO 222 / 2011 (31 July 2012) [pdf, 60 KB]

   ...for review of a determination by the Standards Committee in respect of a complaint by her against Mr AC, but she has since withdrawn that application. I perceive that Mrs MC may consider by reason of Mr AC’s statement, that Mr AD was therefore responsible for all of Mr AC’s conduct. That is not the case. In the same way as a solicitor should not accept the advice of a barrister uncritically1, a barrister can not escape criticism on the basis that he acted on the instructions...

3. V Nair v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 5 (29 January 2014) [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...alleged professional failings. [3] The factual basis for the grounds of complaint was set out in the Registrar’s Statement of Complaint as a less than detailed narrative of the professional engagement. [4] The adviser lodged a Statement of Reply in response to the Statement of Complaint. [5] The Statement of Complaint refers to various materials filed by the Registrar. When looking at all the material currently before the Tribunal, there is an incomplete picture of the events. Howev...

4. Tuumotooa v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 57 (29 April 2014) [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...complaint. Discussion [9] I have reviewed the statement of complaint and the documents filed in support. I am satisfied the complaint must be upheld in the respects where the Registrar has identified grounds and supporting evidence. [10] In her response to the initial complaint, the adviser stated the complainants did not provide her with the return flight information until 27 May (more than a week after the due date), she has also denied responsibility without reasoning or facts. [...

5. Watene raua ko Ema Kawiti Whānau Trust v Kawiti - Motatau 2 Section 65A (2016) 139 Taitokerau MB 136 (139 TTK 136) [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...that the majority of the trustees support the grant of an injunction. There is also evidence to demonstrate that the trustees are acting within their terms of trust and that they are acting for the benefit of the beneficiaries as a whole. [13] In response to questions from the Court, Mr Hockly responsibly accepted that there is an arguable case in favour of the trustees. [14] As such, I am satisfied that there is a serious question to be tried. Where does the balance of convenien...

6. Notes from Crown Maori Relations hui Rotorua 29 April 2018 [pdf, 433 KB]

   ...Justice submissions database • Request for the Minister of Corrections to meet to discuss issues from Stuart Edwards of Mahi Tahi Trust. • A letter was sent by Ngāti Tarāwhai to the Minister of Conservation. Receipt was acknowledged but no response to content. • Billy Macfarlane requested that the Ministry of Justice help him to set-up a discussion with a senior Corrections official from the National office to discuss the possibility of continuing to fund a specific reha...

7. E97A Paul Kennedy - Supplementary Statement - Applicant [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...with holding the America's Cup in Auckland BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Regulatory Authority SUPPLEMENTARY STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF PAUL KENNEDY ON BEHALF OF PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND IN RESPONSE TO COURT’S QUESTIONS (COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL) 5 September 2018 3108A 31096021_1.docx 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 My full name is Paul Cameron Kennedy. I have prepared a primary statement of evidence dated 7 August 20181, and confir...

8. E56 Mirko Groeschner - EIC - Challenger of Record AC36 [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...different it was to the original design guidelines document. 3.3 The DR document is overly prescriptive, and will significantly limit the design possibilities of syndicates wishing to set up team bases, as well as other areas that fall within COR36 responsibility. 3.4 It raised very real concerns for COR36 about whether it would still be able to achieve all its objectives for spectacular and innovative design of structures on the waterfront. 2 1932 3.5 The designs of team bas...

9. [2018] NZEnvC 121 Albert Road Investments Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...issued pursuant to section 224(c) of the Act, the consent holder shall satisfy the following conditions at the consent holder's cost : Provide for electric power (a) Written confirmation shall be provided from the electricity network supplier responsible for the area, that provision of an electric supply can be made available by underground means to Lot 2 and the network supplier's requirements for making such means of supply available. Provide for telephone (b) Written co...

10. Clarkson - Mangaraire B No 2 (2016) 55 Takitimu MB 161 (55 TKT 161) [pdf, 304 KB]

    ...uncle Rue Eriha was previously an owner in the land. He had swapped shares with his sister Hinemoeroa Eriha. Ms Clarkson’s purpose in providing a gift is, she claimed, so that her uncle could continue his relationship with the land. [6] In response to the objection from Mr Hutcheson, Ms Clarkson made two points. First, she claimed that Mr Hutcheson only has a relationship because his mother was a whangai. She argued that Mr Hutcheson therefore gained entry to the land by bei...