Search Results

Search results for response.

15750 items matching your search terms

  1. Shaw - Tauwhao Te Ngare (2004) 79 Tauranga MB 40 (79 T 40) [pdf, 1.4 MB]

    ...received the Applicant's Application for Leave to File Further Submissions dated 21 October 2004, incorporating submissions as to why the Court should grant leave. Counsel for the Respondent then filed a Memorandum dated 2,d November 2004 in response. The question for the Court is whether to allow the filing of further submissions by the Applicant. Grounds for the Application for Leave The Application for Leave was made on the grounds that: 1. Respondent Counsel had refus...

  2. Jarrett - Ngapeke 1J2B2B2 (2002) 71 Tauranga MB 31 (71 T 31) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    ...Glenda Jarrett as owner of Ngapeke 1 J2B2B2A Block to draw water from the pump and spring on Ngapeke 1 J2B2B2B Block for household and associated purposes on the following terms: (1) She is to pay an annual fee of $100.00 to the Trust (2) She is responsible for maintaining the pipeline from the pump to her property (3) The Trust is responsible for maintaining the pump (4) The Trust may adjust the annual fee from time to time by giving Glenda Jarrett one month's notice of an...

  3. Raumati - Urenui Pā (2019) 394 Aotea MB 272 (394 AOT 272) [pdf, 293 KB]

    ...or otherwise for the application was mixed at best, the owners of the land have already decided on what they wanted. They did so in 1932. In any case, the error was not with the Court but with the Native Affairs Department and those officials responsible for preparing the gazette notice for the Governor’s endorsement. What is not in doubt is that the owners of the land in 1932 394 Aotea MB 275 required that the land be set aside for the benefit of the Ngāti Mutunga tribe. T...

  4. [2018] NZEnvC 223 Burgoyne v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 2.1 MB]

    ...cogent manner. Directions [15] Accordingly, given that Mr Burgoyne was due to file his evidence by Friday 16 November, we allow him a short extension (although not requested) to 5.00pm, Friday 23 November 2018 and a short opportunity extension for response by the Applicant to 5.00pm, Friday 30 November 2018. This means that the Applicant's response would need to be filed along with the copies of evidence on 30 November 2018. [16] Other directions, including the requirements f...

  6. CoCA Fixed Fees Schedule Jul 2020 [pdf, 173 KB]

    ...has directed that the application is to proceed to a hearing, these fees cannot be claimed in association with other pre-hearing fees. Pre-Hearing matters Activity Fees Tasks Pre-Hearing Matters # $620 For • Receiving notice of response (or attendance at Court of respondent, or indication of respondent to lawyer for child that respondent intends to defend application) and undertaking negotiations accordingly • Taking further instructions and reviewing merit • F...

  7. Carey Clan Trust v Still [pdf, 23 KB]

    ...these proceedings. Mr Buckley was alleged to have provided further confirmation that the property was safe to purchase. However Mr Buckley was firstly asked in his capacity as the person employed by the company to make the report, and secondly his response cannot be separated from the report, as it was not alleged that he contradicted what he said in the report. As a result, the Tribunal held that Mr Buckley has the benefit of the same disclaimer. The Tribunal stated that if it is wr...

  8. Recusal guidelines [pdf, 81 KB]

    ...at the earliest opportunity. Disclosure should be made in writing and through the Case Manager to all interested parties. The coroner should invite them to indicate if they have any views on whether the coroner should recuse themselves. A time for response should be given. 16.1. Disclosure is necessary whenever the coroner feels that an interest should be considered by counsel on an informed basis. Disclosure of any matter which might give rise to objection should be undertaken even i...

  9. D v Secretary for Justice 25 September 2016 NZRA 001/2016 [pdf, 46 KB]

    ...that the regulations state that he must have 36 months recent experience working on approval level 2 criminal proceedings and not that he needed to have held approval as a legal aid provider for 36 months in respect of such proceedings. 13. In response to that submission, the Secretary relies on the Authority’s decision in AE v Secretary for Justice (RA 005/12). That decision considered the requirements of clause 4 of the Schedule to the Legal Services (Quality Assurance) Regulation...

  10. Employment Court AVL Guideline [pdf, 194 KB]

    ...witness unless that action is to comply with a direction of the Judge (such as where the witness is asked to mark a passage of text or to identify part of a document); and (c) unless the Judge directs otherwise, the party calling the witness is responsible for securing documents referred to or relied on at the remote place and sending them to the Court as soon as possible after the AVL ends. [20] For the avoidance of doubt, if the witness is expected to refer to or rely on a lot of...