Auckland Standards Committee v Sorensen [2012] NZLCDT 23 [pdf, 140 KB]
...of the legal profession. It was well established that the profession’s reputation relies on trust, and trust had been severely prejudiced by Mr Sorensen’s dishonesty. [12] It was also a concern, the Committee said, that Mr Sorensen’s response, when first asked for an explanation (after the matter had been discovered during a regular Law Society inspection), was to suggest he had behaved appropriately. That, the Standards Committee submitted, was an aggravating factor, sayi...