Search Results

1. KI v Accident Compensation Corporation (Contribution to Cost of Treatment) [2024] NZACC 011 [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...continue to attend the Stuart Centre two half days per week. [23] The report also commented: In terms of her psychotropic medication, I prefer to await Dr Armstrong’s report. She remains on a high dose of citalopram, 80mg mane, and this could be responsible for some of her manic features … [24] An impairment assessment report was carried out on 13 July 2004. A final whole person impairment rating of 57 per cent was reached. Then followed two serious injury assessment follow...

2. NZCVS-Cycle-5-Distribution-of-crime-v2 [xlsx, 195 KB]

   ...other hand, when the confidence intervals of two estimates do overlap, the difference between the estimates is described as not statistically significant. This is a more conservative approach than a formal statistical test. Don't know/refusal responses Residual response categories such as "don't know" and "don't wish to answer" are generally excluded from analysis. This is generally the case for analysis of victimisation and rates of reporting victimisations...

3. [2021] NZEnvC 131 Wilson v Waikato Regional Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...such time as they can be successfully removed for seeding, the appellant interprets this further on-growing as “spat holding” not covered by r 16.5.1. Counsel refers to a report provided by OAL’s consultants (Pacific Coastal Ecology) in response to a WRC request for further information about the Proposal. It states:12 11 Outline of submissions for Mr Wilson, dated 2 November 2020, at [12]. 12 NOE, l 10-34, referring to Pacific Coastal Ecology Ecological Effects Resul...

4. [2011] NZEmpC 70 Telecom New Zealand Limited v Long published version [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...damages that the Court might make on that undertaking. Relevant facts [4] Donald Long was employed from 4 November 2010 in a senior executive Information Technology (IT) role with Telecom’s division known as Gen-i. During that time he was responsible exclusively for a major account customer (which will be described as “AB”). The AB IT account is one of the largest in Telecom’s portfolio. [5] For about the last 18 months it has been known to Telecom that AB intends to p...

5. [2011] NZEmpC 77 Mercer v Maori TV Services [pdf, 70 KB]

   ...that the plaintiff had filed an amended statement of claim on 29 March 2010, which had departed significantly from the original statement of claim and this had involved the defendant in the additional expense of drafting a statement of defence in response. He also advised that to respond to the issues raised in the original statement of claim, the defendant was in the course of arranging to have evidence led from a witness now in Las Vegas, Nevada, and that a judicial conference on...

6. [2010] NZEmpC 97 Evolution E-Business Ltd v Smith [pdf, 27 KB]

   ...counterclaim in these proceedings? That statement of defence should have been filed within 30 days after service on the plaintiff of the defendant’s statement of defence and counterclaim on 11 May 2010. [3] The plaintiff’s representative accepts responsibility for not filing and serving its statement of defence in time. Dean Organ, the plaintiff’s advocate, says that in the two weeks before 11 June 2010, which was the last date for filing within time, two children...

7. Misuse of Drugs Amendment Bill [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...Court of Appeal). 2 Hansen v R [2007] NZSC 7 at [123]. iii. is the limit in due proportion to the importance of the objective? Is the objective sufficiently important? 13. The objective of the temporary drug order provisions is to enable a response to a rapidly adapting synthetic drug market that poses a high risk to public health. New, and potentially harmful, products are swiftly produced and current classification processes, which occur via legislative amendment, are unable t...

8. [2009] NZEmpC CC 15/09 The Travel Practice Ltd v Owles [pdf, 27 KB]

   ...plaintiff was represented by its manager and director, Dennis Price. In the proceedings before the Court, however, the plaintiff has retained Mr Butler as its advocate. The defendant has been represented throughout by Mr Beck as counsel. [11] In response to the Authority’s draft report, Mr Beck and Mr Butler both provided comments. Two affidavits were also provided on behalf of the plaintiff. One was by Mr Price. The other was by Mr Albertson, an employee of the plaintiff....

9. CAC303 v Patricia Kerr [2015] NZREADT 33 [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...namely, 207A Hill Street and 9 Adams Road. At all material times, the licensee was the property manager of the two properties. [5] The complainants allege that when the defendant acquired the Ray White franchise at Paeroa in October 2011, she assumed responsibility for managing those two rental properties. [6] A tenant of 207A Hill Street, whose rent was in arrears, was removed in June 2012. The licensee appointed a new tenant of that property in August 2012. The new tenant paid mo...

10. E v Hakaoro [2015] NZIACDT 29 (17 March 2015) [pdf, 138 KB]

    ...documentation with a request. [6.1.6] Immigration New Zealand notified Mr Hakaoro the first request had been refused. He told the complainant some 15 months later that Immigration New Zealand was considering the request. Mr Hakaoro had, in fact, received a response from Immigration New Zealand in respect of the two requests. [6.1.7] Mr Hakaoro engaged in dishonest or misleading behaviour by providing the false information to his client, and potentially breached his duties of due care,...