Search Results

1. LS v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2025] NZACC 109 [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...appellant’s mother to section 161(3) of the Accident Compensation Act 2001 which provides that, if an appeal is not prosecuted with due diligence, the Court may dismiss the appeal on the application of any party. The appellant, or anyone else responsible for progressing her appeal, is therefore required to comply promptly with deadlines and Court directions in the future processing of his appeal, failing which her appeal will be at further risk. [23] There are no issues as to...

2. Taylor v Orcon Ltd [2015] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...relevant, and not misleading. [47] Given the clear and explicit terms of Principle 8, an agency (as defined in s 2 of the Act) which provides personal information to a debt collection agency or to a credit reporting agency bears a clearly defined legal responsibility to make sure the information is (inter alia) accurate, up to date and not misleading. [48] Given the findings of fact made earlier, our conclusion on Principle 8 is that: [48.1] Notwithstanding it was on clear notice the...

3. Tabram v Slater [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...Agreement. The Purchaser will within 2 working days of receiving the Building Inspection Report give written notice of any reason/s for disapproval, and the Vendor shall have two (2) working days, after receiving such notice, to accept (in writing) responsibility for remedying any such reason/s prior to settlement. If the Vendor does not accept responsibility as aforesaid then this Agreement will be voidable at the option of either party. [71] Clause 15 provided that the Tabr...

4. [2020] NZEnvC 122 Auckland Council v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...commence until all measures identified in the CTMP as needing to be put in place prior to the commencement of works have been put in place. 29. The CTMP shall be implemented and maintained throughout the construction period. Advice Note: It is the responsibility of the consent holder to confirmation of the appropriateness of the CTMP from Auckland Transport. Please contact Auckland Transport on (09) 355 3553 and review www.beforeudig.co.nz before you begin works. Pre-start mee...

5. [2021] NZREADT 27 Harvey v Lowe (10 June 2021) [pdf, 388 KB]

   ...the Lowes in writing (and if not, why not), and whether he had caveated or qualified the 6 At paragraphs 3.30–3.31. 7 At paragraphs 3.28–3.40. 8 At paragraph 3.41.3.49 information he provided to the Crowes. The Committee received responses to its questions from Mr Harvey’s counsel. [23] The Committee concluded that:9 [a] despite recognising that the view from No 28 and what the Lowes might build on No 26 were significant issues, it was remarkable that Mr Harvey...

6. DIJ v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...occurred later that same evening/early morning, after the plaintiff and the accused had interacted with Police in the street near the accused’s home and were returning to the accused’s home. Plaintiff’s 2016 access request and Police’s response [10] The plaintiff asked Police in early February 2016 for access to “all information held by the Police about me.” All of the events narrated below relate to this 2016 request for 4 access to information. In other words...

7. Wedgwood v Accident Compensation Corporation (Social rehabilitation) [2024] NZACC 205 [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...symptoms. Among them were thermoregulation issues. He said that there were significant issues with reduced cold tolerance and that heat intolerance was also associated with an increase in fatigue. He said that some of these issues had shown a response to the use of desmopressin. Other symptoms related to slowed information processing and other cognitive dysfunctions. Dr Newburn made a diagnosis of a personality change associated with the traumatic brain injury and a post-concus...

8. BMN v Stonewood Group Ltd [2024] NZHRRT 64 [pdf, 324 KB]

   ...the laptop, including medical records and a tax return. I propose I bring a USB drive to the [redacted] address and meet with a staff member who has access to the laptop. I would expect a reasonable employer to accommodate this request. [12] In response, Mr Gilchrist told BMN he would try and retrieve his personal information by 4.30 pm that day, but that did not eventuate. [13] On 6 April 2019, BMN wrote to Miss Jenny Chow and Mr Gilchrist, referring to his previous requests for...

9. LCRO 154/2024 WK v QM (26 June 2025) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...be quoted in evidence in a subsequent legal proceeding. The applicant has chosen to breach her obligation in that regard in making the complaint. She can do so with impunity because there is no sanction for doing so. [78] The respondent cannot responsibly respond to the applicant’s allegations, however. If she did so, she could be subject to professional sanction for breaching various potentially applicable professional duties. Consequently, as a matter of procedural fairness and...

10. Rangahaua Whanui National Overview volume 1 [pdf, 881 KB]

    ...extensively in this area, including the book A Show of Justice: Racial ‘Amalgamation’ in Nineteenth Century New Zealand. Throughout 1973 and intermittently thereafter, I was a consultant to the Department of Lands in Papua New Guinea, with particular responsibility for facilitating cash cropping on cus- tomary (non-registered) land. In 1981 and 1982, I was the director of the Depart- ment of Rural Lands in the Republic of Vanuatu. Between 1979 and 1986, I worked with French academic colleag...