Search Results

Search results for response.

15750 items matching your search terms

  1. [2023] NZIACDT 1 - NI v Chak (5 January 2023) [pdf, 279 KB]

    ...December 2021), with supporting documents. At the Tribunal’s request, the Registrar provided further information on 21 September and 6 October 2022. [56] On 21 February 2022, the complainant filed a statement of reply (17 February 2022) and a response (21 February 2022) to Mr Chak’s statement of reply, with supporting documents. [57] Mr Chak has filed a statement of reply (4 February 2022), with submissions and supporting documents. He filed further submissions (8 March 2022...

  2. [2013] NZREADT 62 – REAA v Clark (23 July 2013) [pdf, 303 KB]

    ...complainant, Mr Rea put it to her that the complainant had remarked to the daughter, Astrid, that she (the daughter) and Karen Clark had a similar surname and was told by Astrid that her mother Karen was an owner of the section. The complainant’s response to this question was “absolutely not so”. [35] The complainant said that she had simply viewed the section from the street and then made an offer for it. She had not realised that the house at number 7, where she dealt with t...

  3. [2025] NZEmpC 136 Tighe-Umbers v Jetconnect Limited [pdf, 223 KB]

    ...JUDGE M S KING [1] In 2005, Captain Phillip Tighe-Umbers commenced employment with Jetconnect Limited as a pilot. Captain Tighe-Umbers was dismissed from his employment on 24 April 2022 for non-compliance with the COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order 2021 (the vaccination order). Captain Tighe-Umbers unsuccessfully pursued a personal grievance claim in the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) claiming that he was unjustifiably dismissed by Jetconnec...

  4. Court-User-Survey-2025-results.pdf [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    ...before the dataset is provided to the Ministry of Justice in order to minimise the number of people who may access identifying information. Analysis Survey results are produced after data collection, cleaning, and ethnicity coding are completed. Responses are grouped into an overall result and into sub-groups, such as demographic groups or people involved in certain types of court proceedings. All analysis is done using R. 25 To highlight only meaningful differences, two criteri...

  5. Gillies v Lucas - Waipuka No C No 1 and Others (2025) 124 Tākitimu MB 51 (124 TKT 51) [pdf, 312 KB]

    ...was partitioned into a separate block wholly owned by the Whānau Trust. Ms Gillies and her whānau therefore seek a partition, emphasising their reliance on Te Puni Kōkiri to provide the financial resources necessary for this development. Responses to the application [8] The Court heard the views of owners opposed to the partition. Their reasons for opposition include concerns that: (a) If the partition was granted, prime land would be granted to the Whānau Trust to the detr...

  6. Enviro NZ Services Ltd v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work-Related Personal Injury) [2025] NZACC 111 [pdf, 290 KB]

    ...work-related injury occurred. [3] The Corporation’s position is that it had sufficient evidence to accept the claim. [4] The Court was informed that Mr Dellow has been notified of this proceeding by counsel and the Registry. However, there was no response from him. [5] The agreed issue is whether Mr Dellow suffered a work-related personal injury on 18 October 2023 while working for Enviro NZ. Agreed statement of facts [6] Mr Dellow worked as a machine operator for Enviro NZ...

  7. LCRO 21/2025 CB v AC (28 August 2025) [pdf, 213 KB]

    ...justice…”, of which she submitted there were three. First, the applicant submitted that: The [Committee] resolved to inquire into the complaint…and requested further information. I provided this but I received no notice of any issues arising from my response before being asked to attend a mediation. The [Committee] gave me no notice of why they considered mediation was appropriate in this case, and I 8 was required to agree to a mediation without first understanding whether...

  8. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee v A [2014] NZLCDT 77 [pdf, 581 KB]

    ...There is suspicion about signatories as executing the documents and the witnessing thereof. What is clear is that the practitioner did not complete the transaction. The areas of doubt are not a reflection on the practitioner nor are they his responsibility. [54] The Tribunal accordingly finds that charge two is not proved. [55] Accordingly, the Tribunal further finds that costs should lie where they fall. Amendment of particulars [56] The applicant asked for amendment of the par...

  9. Rashid v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claim for treatment injury) [2025] NZACC 178 [pdf, 218 KB]

    ...hyperalgesia. These factors do not indicate neuropathic pain as an underlying diagnosis. The presence of pinprick hyperalgesia indicates that there might be an element of disorder of central pain modulation. [33] On 1 December 2019, Dr Aamir reported in response to questions from Mr Rashid’s advocate: In my opinion Mr Rashid’s chronic pain condition was caused by the treatment and not failure of the treatment. It is my understanding that he underwent an elective surgery. ...