Search Results

1. YCAP - action planning presentation [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...groups to look more intensively at those local areas or issues, including others from the community in coming up with actions to tackle relevant issues.] Think about: • What works for us? •What works for the various communities we are responsible for? •What’s the best way forward for us? Build a shared picture •This goes back to the statistics we were gathering in step one. We will need to analyse them as a group. At the same time, we will need do a stock-take of...

2. Graham - Parish of Komakorau Lot 240B2 (2016) 124 Waikato Maniapoto MB 188 (124 WMN 188) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...the Court currently has is that attached to the affidavit of Mānia Hope. The applicants need to file a clean unmarked copy of the plan prior to the recommendation being signed off by me. [37] Thereafter the Chief Executive of Te Puni Kōkiri is responsible for publishing any notice in the New Zealand Gazette concerning the recommendation. There should be no further burial of any tūpāpaku in the urupā until that event occurs. Orders [38] The Court makes an order pursuant to s...

3. Provider manual: 1b temporary approvals operational policy [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...any); and - the amount of work already undertaken on the specific proceeding (if any). 8 Application Assessment, Decision and Review Application assessment and recommendation Functions of the Internal Assessor The Internal Assessor is responsible for: • determining whether an application is complete; • performing checks on an application where appropriate; • making an assessment of an application; and • making a recommendation to the Secretary for a decision. Appl...

4. [2010] NZSC 218 CA780/2009 Parker v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [pdf, 32 KB]

   ...be entitled. Had reinstatement been sought and a viable remedy, it is likely that I would have granted leave, although on strict terms and on conditions as to costs. In my assessment, however, the applicant can be compensated adequately if those responsible for these gross, largely unexplained and inexcusable delays, were negligent. [14] He concluded his judgment with the following observation:9 Finally, although it is not for this Court to determine issues of ethical professional...

5. A&B DE v FG & JK LCRO 86/2014 (16 March 2015) [pdf, 46 KB]

   ...tax. [13] Mr and Mrs DE lodged their complaint on 27 March 2013. The complaint form referred to “MN” as the lawyer complained about. The Complaints Service processed this as a complaint against Mr FG who responded to the complaint. In his response, Mr FG noted that Mr JK and another member of the firm were also involved. The Complaints Service then wrote to Mr JK on 30 April 2013 to request his response to the complaint. [14] Mr JK responded, by noting that the initial comp...

6. Williamson v Tangilanu [2012] NZIACDT 18 (8 May 2012) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...has applied for suppression of her name and identifying details; however she has not advanced any reason that can sensibly be weighed in favour of restricting publication. On the contrary, she has had a finding made against her that she has been responsible for serious professional failings, and it is in the public interest that the decisions relating to that be published in full. [45] Accordingly, the decision upholding the complaint and the present decision will be published in the us...

7. IQ v SG LCRO 56 / 2011 (2 March 2012) [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...complaint to the New Zealand Law Society (NZLS) of 29 March 2010 the Applicant claimed that she had been overcharged by the Practitioner and sought the return of “money plus interest”. She was also unhappy about aspects of the Practitioner’s response to her enquiry about the costs and her request for timesheets. Her final complaint was that she had been sent a copy of the High Court judgment without it containing both the signature of the Judge and the Court’s formal seal....

8. KW v WB LCRO 118 / 2010 (20 April 2012) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...description of his role, he disagreed with the statement that the Practitioner’s brief was finished apart from the distribution of the funds. The Applicant said this statement “was incorrect as distributions of funds agreed to by the parties was the responsibility of [the Practitioner’s firm]”. He continued that the Practitioner did not know that he had engaged the other lawyer prior to when that lawyer requested the transfer of the funds. [13] The Applicant was unable t...

9. The Māori Trustee v Smith - Waipaoa 5A2 (2017) 65 Tairawhiti MB 215 (65 TRW 215) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...I do not see the public interest in the proceedings as significant one way or the other. [20] For reasons already traversed, the overall balance of convenience clearly tells against the granting of a stay. To date, the Māori Trustee has taken a responsible position with respect to the orders recorded in my reserved decision. Given the divisions between the Smith estate beneficiaries, the Māori Trustee did not wish to inflame the situation. However, the ongoing lack of income and th...

10. ENV-2016-AKL-000200 Fengli Hou Wanshi Ryui Trust Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]

    ...of the RMA as to service of this notice on other persons. (e) The Trust attaches the following documents to th is notice: (a) a copy of the relevant decision; (b) a copy of correspondence sent to Council on 6 September 2016 and Council 's response to that correspondence; (c) a list of names and addresses of persons served with a copy of this notice (see Page 5). Signature of appellants Address for service of appellant PO Box 55338 Eastridge Auckland 1146 02102415618...