[2023] NZEmpC 211 ELG v KLE [pdf, 185 KB]
...the company that was in KLE’s possession had been removed from the workplace. Inquiries were made of KLE over the following days, asking for the return of that property. It now appears that some property was returned reluctantly and only in response to specific requests. [10] ELG says that it has now become apparent that KLE has not returned all of the hardware items he has removed. Some of that hardware is replaceable but the way in which KLE dealt with reasonable requests f...