Search Results

Search results for response.

15750 items matching your search terms

  1. Registrar of IAA v Ryan - [2019] NZIACDT 75 (7 November 2019) [pdf, 361 KB]

    ...“here at Bite” was Mr Kerr. Mr Ryan said he had viewed the file and could confirm that Mr J was a client service manager. Mr J worked on numerous small and medium corporate accounts, as well as offshore accounts. He had installed ICT and was responsible for training and backup. He provided remote access support for onshore and offshore clients for the parent company in the United Kingdom on a 24/7 basis. [62] The residence visa was declined by Immigration New Zealand. (M...

  2. [2024] NZEmpC 125 Cronin-Lampe v Minister of Education [pdf, 607 KB]

    ...category 2, however, should apply to attendances that preceded the preparation that occurred for the substantive hearing because they did not involve complexity that would justify a category 3 finding. Discussion as to correct category [29] In response to the submission made for the Ministry that Mr and Mrs Cronin- Lampe’s case was the subject of delays during part one, I have reviewed both the memoranda filed for the parties at the time, and the minutes of the Court in response....

  3. MacNaughtan v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury/Causation) [2023] NZACC 160 [pdf, 327 KB]

    ...Professor Bremner also provided a report dated 3 April 2018 in which he summarised his research and opinion that Isotretinoin causes psychiatric disorders. [32] Professor Bremner’s report of 5 April 2018 was reviewed by Dr Jansen, who provided a response dated 1 May 2018. Dr Jansen reiterated his view that the appellant had not suffered a physical injury, that the types of changes identified by Professor Bremner did not constitute physical injury for ACC purposes and that Professor...

  4. Mota v Accident Compensation Corporation (Deemed cover decision) [2025] NZACC 47 (20 March 2025) [pdf, 342 KB]

    ...Courts.”7 b) Sections 48, 50 and 54 of the Act which together set out a process whereby the claim is lodged for a personal injury and not for the cause of that injury, the Corporation must take “all circumstances” into account in discharging its responsibility to decide cover or not and the purpose of the Act is for the Corporation to investigate all possible aspects of an injury and manage the various causative tests. [61] Mr Forster then turns to the evidence. He paints...

  5. Discussion Document Review of the Courts Remote Participation Act 2010 [pdf, 487 KB]

    ...Rights Act 1990 (NZBORA) affirms fundamental rights that have implications for the conduct of court proceedings. It informs the development of all legislation, including legislation governing court procedure. During court hearings, the judiciary are responsible for giving effect to the rights protected by the NZBORA, including: • section 23 – the right of a person who has been arrested to be brought as soon as possible before a court; • section 24 – the right to consult and ins...

  6. FMI v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claim for Cover for Mental Injury) [2025] NZACC 062 [pdf, 375 KB]

    ...relationship between the claimant and the Schedule 3 offence, but the claimant is still the primary victim. (c) The “generous and unniggardly” approach to interpretation has limits and the need for lines of delineation is noted,17 and the policy response in restricting mental injury cover is arguably an exception to the generous and unniggardly approach.18 (d) Comparison with s 21B of the 2001 Act demonstrates that Parliament was aware of the existence of secondary victims and...

  7. Wall v Karaitiana - Tauhara Middle 15 Trust (2008) 87 Taupo MB 107 (87 TPO 107) [pdf, 14 MB]

    ...Tauhara N0l1h land confirms that the Maori community pUlpose benefits have arisen as a result of the loan; (k) no loss has been incuned as the monies have now been convel1ed into fbnds to purchase the land. The trustees have therefore fblfilled their responsibilities in respect of this distributive transaction. They consciously made a decision, were fiIlly informed in making the decision including being informed of the wishes of the beneficiaries, acted intra vires the family groups...

  8. 2024-NZEnvC-016-Director-General-of-Conservation-v-Northland-Regional-Council.pdf [pdf, 1.6 MB]

    ...understand that they were at higher levels. After some consideration we conclude that the application of TL1B should be limited to below the median. We conclude that the application of the trigger above the median would not be a proportionate response to the likely risk of adverse effects on the natural environment, and the economic cost of regulation. In particular, we recognise that it is likely that the hydrograph will drop relatively quickly during summer periods, but thi...

  9. David Bain appendices tabs A to E [pdf, 1.6 MB]

    ...case inevitably involved the proposition that Robin, having killed the other family members, had switched on the computer, typed in the message and committed suicide. 8 . It has never been suggested that anyone other than either Robin or David was responsible for these killings or that the culprit, whoever it was, was not responsible for all of them. Thus, leaving the burden of proof aside, the question has always been, as the judge put it in the opemng line of his summing-up, "Wh...

  10. 2021-07-06 Transcript.pdf [pdf, 2.3 MB]

    ...P Page and B Irving for Clutha District Council, Waitaki District Council, Queenstown Lakes District Council, Dunedin City Council and Central Otago District Council (the Territorial Authorities) J Welsh for Trustpower Limited H Rennie for WISE Response Society Inc NOTES OF EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT TABLE OF CONTENTS SHANE ANTHONY ENRIGHT (AFFIRMED) (VIA AVL) .......................................................................... 2 EXAMINATION: MR MAW ......