[2013] NZEmpC 184 Hutchison v Nelson City Council [pdf, 662 KB]
15750 items matching your search terms
...difficult and frustrating to talk to government agencies about problems or questions they have with an agency or the justice system in general. Often those problems or questions will involve more than one justice sector agency so getting a coordinated response can be hard. Despite this, it is important that agencies hear what victims have to say. The Code says that organisations that provide services to victims must make it easy for victims to give feedback or make a complaint. How to give feed...
..."Version 1 ". An updated set of conditions dates 23 August 2019 was provided to the Court by Mr Lala when he gave evidence. These are referred to as "Version 2" of the conditions. Mr Lala advised that Version 2 had been prepared in response to various issues raised during the hearing. A further set of amended conditions dated 12 September 2019 was provided to us by counsel for Panuku at the resumed hearing on 24 September 2019. These are referred to as "Version 3&qu...
A legal guardian is an adult who’s responsible for your child’s care, growth, and upbringing. Find out more about what it means to be a guardian and how guardianship comes to an end.
The Family Court can make a Protection Order to help protect someone against family violence. Find out more about the different types of protections orders and how they work.
...making general submissions on Plan Change 8 • G F Dowling Ltd • Federated Farmers of New Zealand - Otago and North Otago Provinces • Te Runanga o Ngai Tahu • MF and DA Dowling • Elizabeth Clarkson • Nicola McGrouther • Wise Response Society Inc • Director General of Conservation • Two Farmers Farming Ltd • Landpro Limited • WAI Wanaka - Upper Clutha Lakes Trust • William Thompson • Springwater Ag Limited • Beef + Lamb New Zealand • Ota...
...expert evidence on the history of ownership of Lake Horowhenua, as well as relevant legislative history. 40 Parties were again afforded an opportunity to respond to the evidence of Dr Gilling, resulting in some robust discussion. [32] In response to a number of the issues raised at the hearing held on 10 October 2005, I issued a direction on 7 November 2005, concerning the need for the trustees to compile a list of beneficiaries for the block as a matter of priority. 41 Once...
...document and supplied to the Court as an attachment to these minutes. It was acknowledged that some of the amendments will require the Judge to give a direction as they require legal verification. It was also suggested that the Trustees will become responsible to work on the amendments over the following year as provided by the beneficiaries. The Chair put a resolution to the meeting which was moved by Benjamin Diaz and seconded by Emma Hansen that the proposed draft Trust Order b...
...justify him having answered the interrogatories in respect of a singular complaint only. He argues that there was by that stage no complaint by Priestley J extant. Background to Charges 11 and 12 [60] These charges arose out of Mr Dorbu’s response to an interim decision in the course of these proceedings. Although the two charges were nominally denied initially, it was clear by the conclusion of the hearing that they were admitted and indeed Mr Dorbu wrote (and produced to the...
...with the evidence given by Mr Montgomery, Ms Brockie and their witnesses. As to this we are satisfied that the evidence of the plaintiff’s witnesses is to be preferred. We now explain why. [85] The evidence of the plaintiff was compelling. Her responses in cross-examination were direct, frank and forthright. There was no prevarication, awkward hesitation or exaggeration. She readily conceded when she did not know the answer to a question or could be mistaken. Her evidence is cons...