Search Results

1. ME & NN v QU Ltd [2021] NZDT 1494 (5 May 2021) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...February 2020. 8. ME and NN suggest that QU is a tour operator that buys individual travel components from their suppliers and combines them into a package tour. This package is then sold with its own price tag to the public directly and QU is responsible for arranging and delivering the services specified in the package. They may provide some of these services themselves, such as a tour guide, or can obtain the services from other suppliers. 9. Mr P, director of QU, says that QU i...

2. [2021] NZEnvC 154 - Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated & Others v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 457 KB]

   ...and serve on all parties that provided written comments: (i) a report which summarises the feedback received (if any), (ii) a link to all written comments received (should the Court wish to review that documentation); and (ii) affidavit evidence in response to any evidence filed, which supports any modified recommendations for the proposed policy alteration (if any). Court’s determination d. On receipt of all of the information listed under (b) and (c), the Court will consider the mate...

3. Forests (Legal Harvest Assurance) Amendment Bill [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...parts 5, 6, 7 and new Schedule 3 into the principal Act and makes a number of other consequential amendments. New part 5 relates to legal harvest assurance. It establishes a regulatory system for legal harvest, which; a. requires a person who is responsible for harvesting regulated timber to provide legal harvest information about timber, keep the legal harvest information up-to-date; and keep records of any legal harvest information they have provided; b. requires a person to be...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 242 Adams v Thames-Coromandel District Council [pdf, 470 KB]

   ...GENERAL 1. The subdivision authorised by this consent proceeds in general accordance with the information provided with the application, namely: - Resource consent application prepared by Thames Environmental Consultancy dated 6 July 2020; - Response to Further Information and Boundary Adjustment Application prepared by Thames Environmental Consultancy dated 6 November 2020. - Building Suitability Report prepared by Llandem Consulting Engineers Ltd dated 1 November 2018; - Assessm...

5. [2023] NZEmpC 51 Halse v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...relate to the parties in these proceedings. It notes that these proceedings have not been appealed, nor can they be because the time limit for doing so has passed. In relation to its application for costs, it says that it is a public body with responsibility for recovering costs, it was successful, and is entitled to have its application for those costs determined. It says that the grounds and legal tests required to be met for a stay are not met and that there is no proper basis to...

6. Auckland Standards Committee 4 v Holdaway [2023] NZLCDT 8 (6 April 2023) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...framed, reveal serious practice deficits to which we must respond because the public interest is engaged. Will anything less than strike-off do? [15] In the case of Holland,6, the Tribunal said: [3] Nonetheless, strike-off is the most severe response available to us. It is only available if we are unanimous. We should not, and would prefer not to, strike her off unless it is the least restrictive outcome. The need to impose the least restrictive outcome was explicitly noted in Dan...

7. [2022] NZEnvC 151 Greenacres Waiheke Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...received a request for further information under section 92 of the Resource Management Act 1991 on 10 March 2022. The appellant and its advisors have been working on a 3 See [13] of decision [2022] NZEnvC 052 for stay conditions 13(a)-(e). 4 response, and advise that a full response will be ready for lodgement with the Council by 5 August 2022; and (e) Stay Condition 13(d) - the appellant submitted an ecological survey to supports is resource consent application to the respondent...

8. Falp - Succession to Bernard Albert Falp (2022) 449 Aotea MB 210 (449 AOT 210) [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...“Kia ora, thank you for contacting me, unfortunately I am currently in the United States and will not be able to attend the hearing. Sincerely, Leshia Falp.” [12] On 13 of April 2021, the case manager responded to Leshia thanking her for her response: That is totally fine that you are not able to attend. However, as you are legally entitled to succeed to your fathers Māori land, he holds in his name absolutely, can I please have a contact address for you that I can add to the c...

9. [2022] NZACC 27 - Alves v ACC (3 March 2022) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...a duty to recognise cover, or to investigate the prospect for cover, in the absence of Mr Alves applying for cover for any other reason (such as whether the injury on 17 September 2019 was in fact a rotator cuff tear, as later diagnosed).4 The responsibility for lodging such a claim for cover lay with Mr Alves. [31] Second, prior to the review hearing, the Corporation alerted Mr Alves to the need for him to lodge a claim for additional cover for the rotator cuff tear, if he so wi...

10. IN Ltd v NB [2022] NZDT 74 (22 February 2022) [pdf, 101 KB]

    ...driving it, I consider it unlikely that he would immediately have contacted IN to complain about the warning lights, and then voiced a concern to NT only about warning lights and, perhaps, brake noise. His car was insured by BNJ, and a reasonable response to a collision or impact that had caused extensive damage would have been to lodge a claim with BNJ. In this respect, his behaviour is consistent with his assertion that he believed that the problems identified by NT related to the qualit...