Search Results

1. Wikiriwhi v Walters - Oruanui 9 Block and Part Oruanui 10 Block, Lot 1 Deposited Plan 471989 and Lot 2 Deposited Plan 471989 (2020) 232 Waiariki MB 212 (232 WAR 212) [pdf, 382 KB]

   ...which I issued timetabling directions.16 [18] A memorandum of counsel was filed by the respondents on 4 September 2018, indicating they no longer opposed discovery. I issued directions granting an extension of time for filing statements of response. A joint memorandum of counsel was then filed on 11 February 2019 and the matter was set for hearing in August 2019. [19] The final hearings were held on 13 August 2019 and 14 August 2019.17 At the conclusion of the hearings, I ad...

2. [2022] NZEnvC 178 Lomai Properties Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 698 KB]

   ...Attenuation it will be a restricted discretionary activity. The parties submitted that a restricted discretionary activity that meets specific standards that have been developed to ensure appropriate noise levels, is a more appropriate planning response. [38] Precinct Rule (A3) will apply to any noise sensitive space (including any indoor spaces in Table I447.6.7.1) in a new building or alteration to an existing building that contains an activity sensitive to noise located within 75...

3. Elhassan v Webby [2022] NZHRRT 27 [pdf, 313 KB]

   ...denies she breached HRA, s 53. She says HRA, s 53 does not apply because HRA, s 54 applies as she and Mr Elhassan were sharing residential accommodation in a private residence with a house sharing arrangement between them as flatmates. [46] In response to this, Mr Elhassan does not dispute his accommodation was residential accommodation, but says this was not shared with Ms Webby. The law [47] Section 53 of the HRA, makes it unlawful to discriminate in the provision of land, housi...

4. OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL v NGA RUNANGA & Ors NOE ENV 20210628 [pdf, 481 KB]

   ...P Page and B Irving for Clutha District Council, Waitaki District Council, Queenstown Lakes District Council, Dunedin City Council and Central Otago District Council (the Territorial Authorities) J Welsh for Trustpower Limited H Rennie for WISE Response Society Inc NOTES OF EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT TABLE OF CONTENTS SHANE ANTHONY ENRIGHT (AFFIRMED) (VIA AVL) .......................................................................... 2 EXAMINATION: MR MAW .....

5. [2023] NZIACDT 23 – ED v Dai (11 August 2023) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...unknown date. It was against the unlicensed EI. The Tribunal records that it has no jurisdiction over unlicensed persons, though the conduct of an unlicensed person can be material to the assessment of a complaint against the licensed adviser responsible for the unlicensed person’s work. [37] The complainant stated in her complaints that she had never received any immigration advice from Mr Dai. She had not spoken to him until seeing him at his office on 1 October 2019. He us...

6. Pratt v General Distributors Limited [2025] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 337 KB]

   ...Pratt says that because of his disability, he inevitably meets two of the SCAB factors when not intoxicated as he can have balance issues such that he can appear unsteady on his feet and his speech can be slurred. [24] Mr Radich is the Alcohol Responsibility Manager for Woolworths New Zealand Limited, which owns the defendant. His evidence was that the staff who denied Mr Pratt the sale of alcohol handled the two situations correctly. He says that the defendant’s right and obl...

7. Skipper v Gibson - Ngāti Tawhirikura Hapū Charitable Trust (2025) 498 Aotea MB 148 (498 AOT 148) [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...the paramount authority of Ngāti Tāwhirikura hapū over its affairs, rohe whenua and taonga guaranteed to all Māori in Te Tiriti o Waitangi; and (b) all hapū members must be resolute in exercising and defending their personal and collective responsibilities to protect, assert and promote the rangatiratanga and Mana Motuhake of hapū and whanau. This includes the exclusive right of any hapū to (i) interpret, define and represent its: (1) hapūtanga (kinship) to te ao wh�...

8. OIA-118472.pdf [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...provisions in legislation. On 5 February 2025, the Ministry extended the time frame to respond to your request to 6 March 2025 under section 15A(1)(b) of the Act, as consultations necessary to make a decision on your request were such that a proper response to the request could not reasonably be made within the original time limit. The Ministry has interpreted your request as relating to the policy work to review Treaty principles references in legislation. Correspondence related to th...

9. 2021-03-26 Transcript (up to end of day 11) [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...Page & B Irving for Clutha District Council, Waitaki District Council, Queenstown Lakes District Council, Dunedin City Council and Central Otago District Council (the Territorial Authorities) n J Welsh for Trustpower Limited H Rennie for WISE Response Society Inc NOTES OF EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT TABLE OF CONTENTS RODERICK DONALD HENDERSON (AFFIRMED) ............................................................................... 60 QUESTIONS FROM THE...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 34 Chambers v ERS NZ Ltd trading as Trans Pacific [pdf, 11 KB]

    ...be struck out unless one or other of the parties formally advised the Registrar within 14 days of some sound reason why that course should not be followed. [2] The Registrar has confirmed that no advice has been received from either party in response to the 14 February minute. [3] In the circumstances, this proceeding is now struck out. No order is made as to costs. A D Ford Judge Judgment signed at 11.00 am on 5 March 2014