Search Results

1. What happens next

   ...will be removed from the offender’s copy of the claim unless the tribunal believes that information is necessary to ensure the offender is fully and fairly informed about the claim. The offender is allowed to send a written reply to the tribunal in response to your claim. Once the 6 month deadline for receiving claims has passed, your claim is sent to a judge to make a decision about whether any money will be awarded to you. The tribunal doesn’t hold a formal hearing unless there are except...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Victims & justice >
   3. Victims' Special Claims Tribunal

2. Youth justice speeches

   Presentations by the Principal Youth Court Judge John Walker. Whose fault is it when the young and vulnerable offend? 20 March 2018 Description: Judge Walker considers the importance of collective responsibility for tackling the complex underlying causes of youth offending. Whose fault is it when the young and vulnerable offend? Connecting the pieces 03 April 2018 Description: Judge Walker's address to Activity Centres and Engage in Their Future Conference 2018. Connecting the pieces F...

   Located in:

   1. Youth Court >
   2. Youth justice

3. COVID-19 Justice Sector Survey

   ...safety, experience of crime and reporting to Police, how easy the COVID-19 rules are to understand and perceptions of the criminal justice system. Approximately 370 people are contacted each week resulting in approximately 300 finalised interviews (a response rate during the first nine days of interviewing was 82%). The survey follows the NZCVS strict approach to privacy and confidentiality and no contact details of interviewed adults are released. COVID-19 Justice Sector Survey - Report 1 for...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Research & data >
   3. New Zealand Crime & Victims Survey (NZCVS)

4. 2025 NZPSPLA 088 pdf [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...to why his certificate should not be cancelled. In addition, he has not filed any opposition to dealing with the complaint on the papers. [3] The nature and seriousness of Mr Jerome’s offending establishes that he is no longer suitable to be a responsible security worker. Mr Jerome’s certificate of approval is cancelled effective immediately. DATED at Wellington this 27th day of August 2025 P A McConnell Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority...

5. [2010] NZEmpc 111 Smith v Stokes Valley Pharmacy (2009) Limited [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...immediately before signing the employment agreement on 2 October, Ms Smith did raise a general query about the proposed trial period. This did not go so far as to state a disagreement with its inclusion in the agreement. I find that Mr Kearns’ response that Ms Smith should not be concerned about it because such a clause was in all agreements, was intended to indicate to, and was accepted by, her that she was not being singled out for different treatment among the pharmacy’s empl...

6. Far North District Council v Maihi - Okahu 3B2B2 (2014) 91 Taitokerau MB 284 (91 TTK 284) [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...was aware of what had taken place. She opposed the ahu whenua trust at this stage simply because she and her siblings had yet to resolve succession to their mother’s land interests. [66] There was no objection to the nine trustees nominated as responsible trustees or to Mr Reihana-Ngatote, Mr Peters and Mr Mahoney as advisory trustees. However, it was not clear to me the extent to which the nine trustee nominees reflected the ownership interests in all 11 Okahu land blocks. Ahj...

7. Grace – Ngarara West A25B2A (2014) 317 Aotea MB 268 (317 AOT 268) [pdf, 254 KB]

   ...May 2013, an application was received from Patricia Grace for a recommendation that Ngarara West A25B2A be set aside as a Māori reservation. [6] A telephone conference was held on 10 June 2013. 1 Parties agreed to file a statement of issues and responses. A statement of issues was filed by the applicant dated 27 June 2013. A reply was filed by the Transport Agency dated 12 July 2013. [7] A further telephone conference was held on 9 August 2013. 2 There were no objections to...

8. Moananui v Cape Kidnappers Station Limited - Rangaika Native Reserve (2014) 31 Takitimu MB 179 (31 TKT 179) [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...teleconference was held with parties on 15 October 2013. Peter Nee Harland was in attendance as agent for the applicant, and Paul East as counsel for the respondent. The report was discussed and I directed that Mr Nee Harland file submissions in response to the report, and Mr East then file submissions in response to those. At the conclusion of the teleconference, parties agreed that the application be determined ‘on the papers’. [8] Despite this agreement, in submissions dat...

9. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Schubach [2015] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...inability to access his personal information held by Mr Schubach made the conduct of the Family Court proceedings far more stressful than they ought to have been. Mr Heidenbluth’s annoyance and anger was exacerbated by Mr Schubach’s rude and arrogant responses to the request for the relevant papers. He said it was particularly upsetting he could not access a letter from the child’s mother which he had given to Mr Schubach. In this letter the mother said she did not want any contac...

10. E66 Ian Munro - Urban Design - EIC - VHHL [pdf, 1.2 MB]

    ...chapters I211 (Base B), I214 (Bases C-G) and H8 and F2(all bases). On this basis, I consider they are of an appropriate and justified scope. 4. CHANGES TO AGREED DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR YARD FENCE SIGNAGE IDENTIFIED BY MR. GRAEME MCINDOE 4.1 In response to concerns from Emirates Team New Zealand (“ETNZ”) (#75), America’s Cup Event Ltd (“ACEL”) (#76), and the Royal New Zealand Yacht Squadron (“RNZYS”) (#75) that the (then) Design Guidelines should be more flexible,...