Search Results

Search results for response.

15750 items matching your search terms

  1. [2020] NZEmpC 25 Sexton v Lowe [pdf, 174 KB]

    ...course would be for costs to lie where they fall. However, if Mr Lowe seeks costs and they cannot be agreed between the parties, he is to file and serve a memorandum seeking those costs within 30 days of this judgment. Mr Sexton’s memorandum in response then is to be filed and served within a further 30 days. J C Holden Judge Judgment signed at 2 pm on 10 March 2020 12 Sexton v Lowe [2019] NZEmpC 60....

  2. Wellington v Wellington - Tuateanui 2B1A Māori Reservation (2020) 209 Taitokerau MB 59 (209 TTK 59) [pdf, 254 KB]

    ...Waiariki subtribe of Ngatiwai and the people of the Ngunguru district. [5] The marae charter was adopted in 2007 and includes a rotation process where trustees serve a term of three years. [6] The court records show that there are nine trustees responsible for the administration of the marae. These trustees are Ben Wellington Jnr, Ben Wellington Snr, Conrad Grey, Erica Wellington, Henry Parata, Michael Rundlett, Naphelia Brown, Owen Soames and Rose Wellington. The last appointme...

  3. INZ (Foley) v Rodriguez [2019] NZIACDT 60 (30 August 2019) Sanctions [pdf, 115 KB]

    ...day. 1 Immigration New Zealand (Foley) v Rodriguez [2019] NZIACDT 51. 3 [8] On being informed of what had happened that same day, Ms Rodriguez immediately apologised to the employer and took full responsibility for the error. She refunded to the candidate the fees paid and offered to fly him back to the Philippines, but he wanted to go elsewhere in New Zealand where his brother lived. Ms Rodriguez paid his travel to that other New...

  4. LCRO 13/2015 UP v HQ (19 June 2018) [pdf, 174 KB]

    ...Committee determined to take no further action in respect of Mr and Mrs UP’s complaints. The Committee said:4 In relation to the sending of the agreement with the earlier price, the Committee accepts that this was a clerical error that Mr HQ was not responsible for. Ultimately when a mistake is made by a law firm the partners must accept responsibility however Mr HQ was not the cause of the mistake being made. In a disciplinary context, Mr HQ did not personally make the mistake and...

  5. Justice Matters - Issue 12 - October 2018 [pdf, 2 MB]

    ...biggest single reason for that is adjournments: nearly 1 in 3 scheduled trials are adjourned on the day they’re set down for. An analysis of the reasons for adjournments shows that delays occur for a number of reasons – no one participant is responsible for all delays and we all have a role in ensuring that hearings can go ahead as planned. There’s been some helpful commentary in the sector canvassing how case review hearings work and the potential for participants to address mo...

  6. Sec-274-N-Shoebridge-16.6.20-Redacted.pdf [pdf, 110 KB]

    ...“ post construction “ of the motorway and roundabout less than 150 metres from our home, and less than 80 metres from our boundary. @137, of Statement of Evidence of Lonnie Dalzell, he states: “I can assure Mr Shoebridge (and Ms Cooke), in response to comments in his submission, that the Transport Agency certainly has had regard to his home, and I have personally been communicating with Mr Shoebridge on a regular basis since the NoR process. I will keep providing information to Mr...

  7. [2022] NZEmpC 50 Gate Gourmet New Zealand Ltd v Sandhu [pdf, 206 KB]

    ...earlier, I am not prepared (on 5 Services & Food Workers Union v Vice Chancellor of the University of Otago (No 2) [2003] 2 ERNZ 707 (EmpC) at [18]. the material before the Court) to conclude that the plaintiffs should shoulder the responsibility for that or that the failure to agree should sound in an uplift in costs. Nor am I satisfied that increased costs are justified because of evidence filed by the plaintiffs in relation to the matters at issue. Accordingly I...

  8. [2022] NZIACDT 13 – BU v McCarthy (20 June 2022) [pdf, 108 KB]

    ...him. [9] Eventually, on 7 April 2021, the son contacted Immigration NZ and was told that his wife’s visa had expired in March 2006 and no s 61 request had been made. [10] The complainant made a complaint to the Authority in April 2021. In response, Mr McCarthy advised the Authority on 22 June 2021 that he had “largely failed to act” and no request had been made. He provided no explanation to the Authority or the Tribunal. Decision of the Tribunal [11] The Tribunal...

  9. NZ BORA Advice: Land Transport Clean Vehicles Amendment Bill [pdf, 214 KB]

    ...4. The policy objective underpinning the Bill is to achieve a rapid reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from light vehicles imported into New Zealand to assist New Zealand in meeting its 2050 target and emissions budgets under the Climate Change Response Act 2002, and our domestic and international climate change ambitions and commitments.1 5. The Bill is an omnibus Bill that: a. Amends the Land Transport Act 1998 to create a clean vehicle standard for vehicle importers of new and u...

  10. 2021-06-15 Notice of Mediation - PC 8 [pdf, 210 KB]

    ...Walker Law, PO Box 124, Queenstown, ben@toddandwalker.com Interested Party S274 Willowridge Developments Limited Graeme Todd, Todd & Walker Law, PO Box 124, Queenstown 9348, graeme@toddandwalker.com Interested Party S274 Wise Response Society Wise Response Society, NO ADDRESS AVAILABLE, dugald.mactavish@zoho.com EC4240_NoticeOfSessionListOfParties Plan Change 8 (Primary Sector) Mediation Schedul...