Search Results

Search results for response.

15671 items matching your search terms

  1. Greyling v Gimranov [2016] NZIACDT 55 (15 September 2016) [pdf, 216 KB]

    ...Zealand Immigration Advice (or the full course); and the Tribunal should order a caution or censure, payment of a penalty and the refund of part or all of the fees. [5] However, the Registrar’s position depended on Mr Gimranov reflecting on his response to the complaint, his professional duties and agreeing to the course of study. http://www.justice.govt.nz/ 3 Mr Gimranov’s position [6] Mr Gimranov formally acknowledged his errors. However, the acknowledgement wa...

  2. Taueki v Taueki - Horowhenua No 11B Subdivision 14 (2021) 437 Aotea MB 134 (437 AOT 134) [pdf, 264 KB]

    ...decision Dyson – 1 84 Otaki MB 44 (84 OTI 44) 2 109 Aotea MB 58 (109 AOT 58) 437 Aotea MB 136 Muaūpoko Land Trust was issued where the trust was terminated, a new ahu whenua trust was created and Wahiao James Gray was appointed sole responsible trustee.3 [7] Following that, on 21 March 2013, orders were issued vesting five of the blocks into the Muaūpoko Trust.4 The remaining blocks are Horowhenua 11B subdivision No. 8, Horowhenua 11B subdivision No. 9, Horowhen...

  3. Sionetama - Puketapu E Māori Reservation (2021) 436 Aotea MB 273 (436 AOT 273) [pdf, 266 KB]

    ...held earlier this year. In addition, Peter Knuckey subsequently withdrew his nomination. Te Take Issue [5] The issue for determination is whether the remaining nominees, Tiara Puke, Margaret Taylor and Robert Taylor, should now be appointed responsible trustees. Kōrero whānui Background [6] Puketapu E is a block of Māori freehold land 34.05 ha in area located beside the Waiongana Stream near the New Plymouth airport in the Taranaki region. The current appellation w...

  4. Sionepulu v Downer and Police (Costs) [2012] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 76 KB]

    ...having a forum such as the Tribunal which is accessible to every citizen, submits that it must also be in the public interest to prevent unmeritorious claims, even allowing for the latitude which may be afforded to lay litigants. [10] As to the responsibility of Ms Sionepulu for the actions of her husband, the submission for the Commissioner is that one can only surmise at the level of influence and responsibility Mr Butler had in relation to the advancement of the claim by Ms Sionepulu...

  5. Musese v Min [2013] NZIACDT 24 (04 April 2013) [pdf, 119 KB]

    ...Tribunal had reached no conclusions at that point. 4 [22] The key elements of the complaint, and the response identified in the Minute, were as outlined above. [23] The Authority and the complainant do not lay charges, and are not responsible to prove them. The Tribunal is an expert inquisitorial body, which receives complaints, and determines whether the proof before it is adequate to uphold the complaint, and if so in what respects. Accordingly, the Minute identified...

  6. eUpdate November 2019 [pdf, 858 KB]

    ...newsletter updates you on recent cross-government work to eliminate family violence and sexual violence. In this edition we feature: • The Under-Secretary’s Update: Challenging Conversations and Complicated Spaces • Integrated Safety Responses Show Collaboration is Making a Difference • New report: Attrition and Progression: Reported Sexual Violence Victimisations in the Criminal Justice System • Sexual Violence Service Development: Implementing Budget 2019...

  7. LCRO 184/2021 PW v QM (21 March 2023) [pdf, 184 KB]

    ...responsible for the decision to set the fee and issue the bill”, and recommends “[c]aution will need to be exercised where that person is an employed solicitor or legal executive”. [66] Because the task of determining a fee is “often the responsibility of the partners of the firm”, the Practice Note adds it would therefore “be unfair to hold an employee”, who was “not directly responsible” for determining the fee, “professionally responsible” and then make a findi...

  8. BD v J Ltd ES [2021] NZDT 1648 (24 June 2021) [pdf, 129 KB]

    ...sum of $9,796.01 for the costs of repairing the damage to his motorbike. 3. ES and his insurer, J Limited counterclaim the sum of $4,531.83 for the costs of repairing his car. 4. The issues to be determined are as follows: a. Is ES or BD responsible for the collision, or is responsibility shared? b. Are the costs claimed reasonable to put the innocent party back in the position they would have been had the collision not occurred? Is ES or BD responsible for the collision, or i...

  9. Knuckey v Telford - Wahapakapaka 7A (2021) 435 Aotea MB 68 (435 AOT 68) [pdf, 202 KB]

    ...Knuckey.1 1 Knuckey v Telford - Wahapakapaka 7A Block (2021) 431 Aotea MB 119 (431 AOT 119) 435 Aotea MB 69 [2] That response was received on 12 May 2021. This decision now concludes the application to appoint Ms Telford as a responsible trustee. Te take Issue [3] This issue for decision remains whether Ms Telford should be appointed a trustee. Kōrero whānui Background [4] The background to these proceedings is set out in my earlier judgment of 30 Apri...

  10. OIA-104168.pdf [pdf, 1.2 MB]

    ...New Zealand? 4. What organisations does the MOJ work with? 5. Information on how many hours the average community-based offender serve, the type of work they do and how effective this sort of sentencing is. Your request has been referred to me for response, as it falls within my responsibilities as Group Manager (Acting), Courts and Tribunals, Regional Service Delivery, and is being managed in accordance with the provisions of the Act. On 26 April 2023, the Ministry of Justice (the M...