Search Results

1. 2025 NZPSPLA 065 pdf [pdf, 71 KB]

   ...where security guards are required to work. [3] Police have established that grounds for disqualification now apply to Mr Kumar. I am satisfied that the nature and circumstances of his offending establish that Mr Kumar is no longer suitable to be a responsible security worker. I therefore make the following orders: a) Mr Kumar’s certificate of approval is cancelled effective immediately. b) Mr Kumar must return his security ID to the PSPLA within seven days of receipt of this...

2. [2022] NZEnvC 227 Nga Kaitiaki O Te Awa O Ngaruroro [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   NGARURORO-CLIVE WATER CONSERVATION ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 227 IN THE MATTER OF submissions under s 209 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN NGĀ KAITIAKI O TE AWA O NGARURORO (ENV-2019-AKL-000270) HAWKE’S BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2019-AKL-000272) EAST TAUPŌ LANDS TRUST (ENV-2019-AKL-000273) OWHAOKO B & D LANDS TRUST (ENV-2019-AKL-000274) WHITEWATER

3. 2024-NZEnvC-047-Waste-Management-NZ-Limited-v-Hauraki-District-Council.pdf [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   .................................................................................. 61 3.10 Effects on cultural values ....................................................................................... 66 Mitigation proposed by Waste Management and Ngati Hako’s responses ............................................................................................................................................ 81 Findings in relation to cultural effects ........................

4. [2019] NZEnvC 205 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 15 MB]

   ...environment". In landscape terms, that is closely related to s7(c). However, as the DV's RCL regime is described as being for s7(c) purposes, we do not refer to both provisions in this decision (rather, treating matters on the basis that proper response to s7(c) landscape matters effectively covers both provisions). 9 (15] It is helpful to draw from Ms Scott's9 opening submissions for QLDC in summary of the overall design of the DV:10 ... Chapters 3 and 6 seek to app...

5. RC - Felicity Boyd - Statement of Evidence - 17 December 2021 [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...accepted that wastewater contributes to E.coli levels and that stormwater and sediment-laden water contribute to sedimentation in water bodies. The management framework for these types of discharges in the RPW is generally permissive and places responsibility for managing discharges on land managers. It is apparent from water quality monitoring that this approach is not maintaining water quality in parts of the region. 14 The Council resolved to prepare PC8 in August 2019 and work...

6. [2006] NZEmpC CC 11/06 Michael Pearcy Investments Ltd v Miller [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...invoice for my SI trip on 30 November 2003 and when presenting this to Michael I asked him if he had read my memo of 30 October. He said he hadn’t, so I printed this and gave it to him to read. I stood at his door while he read it. His only response to this memo was “the vehicle may not necessarily be a Toyota Landcruiser”. 8. I understood from his response that subject to his proviso on the motor vehicle, my memo accurately recorded the terms of employment the company had...

7. [2012] NZEmpC 20 White & Others v Reserve Bank of New Zealand [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...contracts”. [32] Although estoppel was not pleaded, Mr O’Sullivan invited the Court to consider estoppel and conclude that, “the conduct of the defendant at the relevant times estopped it from progressing its current defence”. [33] In response to the submissions made on behalf of the plaintiffs, Mr Chemis repeated the challenge he made frequently during the course of the hearing that much of the evidence produced by the plaintiffs was irrelevant and inadmissible in that...

8. [2006] NZEmpC AC 73/06 CE Bay of Plenty DHB v NZ PSA [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...Board’s solicitors received a copy of a letter the PSA had forwarded to the Authority, requesting an extension of time for filing and serving briefs of evidence, to Wednesday, 1 September 2004. At this time the Board had received no response from the PSA to its letter of 26 August. [9] By facsimile dated 30 August 2004, the Board’s solicitors wrote to the Authority, advising the Authority of some of the contents of its letter of 26 August 2004 to the PSA, noting that...

9. [2013] NZEmpC 30 Looker v AG Walter & Sons Ltd [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...the challenge and there is no explanation as to why it was left until the last minute. He also observed that Mr Paewai’s affidavit is lacking in specifics about dates upon which particular steps were taken. He submitted that Mr Paewai had the responsibility, knowing of the 28 days requirement, to file within time. He also relied on other breaches of judicial timetables by Mr Paewai both in the Authority and in the Court and submitted it demonstrated a completely cavalier approa...

10. Huata-Kupa v Tataraakina C -Tataraakina C Trust (2015) 40 Tākitimu MB 207 (40 TKT 207) [pdf, 244 KB]

    ...Applicant AND TATARAAKINA C TRUST Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 29 May 2015 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Introduction [1] By application received on 20 October 2014 Tania Huata-Kupa, a former responsible trustee of Tataraakina C Trust (“the Trust”), seeks payment, it would appear, of $18,034.60 from either the Special Aid Fund or from the Trust itself. [2] The independent responsible trustee, Clinton Hemana, seeks directions...