Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 034 Remarkables Park Limited v Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited [pdf, 392 KB]

   ...objectives stated in the Notice to Take. Subject to meeting the statutory tests in s 24(7) PWA the land may be taken. We do not accept the imputation that the taking of private land is not for local work for which the Airport Corporation has financial responsibility . We observe the activities enabled by 86 The court was not addressed on what provision the proposed District Plan makes for this area. B7 Operative District Plan, Activity Area 8. BB Foster, EiC dated 13 December 201 3...

2. Hahn v Walke [2019] NZIACDT 19 (8 April 2019) [pdf, 306 KB]

   ...Authority maintained that NZMI was Ms Walke’s company because its website stated that she was the founder. Ms Walke was advised that she would have to translate into English any documents in German on which she wished to rely. Ms Walke’s response to the Authority’s letter of 19 February 2018 was invited. [48] On 5 April 2018, Ms Walke stated in an email to the Authority that the complaint concerned German language articles, seminars delivered in German in Germany, German lan...

3. Te Manutukutuku 77 [pdf, 7.6 MB]

   ...His PhD thesis, completed in 2012, was on pioneering New Zealand writer James Courage (1903–63). In September 2020, Christopher was appointed to the role of principal facilitator in the Inquiry Facilitation Team. In this role, he is jointly responsible with his fellow principal for the team’s technical leadership. The team liaises with inquiry parties and provides planning, procedural, and analytical support to presiding offi- cers and Tribunal panel members dur- ing the prepar...

4. ENV-2016-AKL-000262 Man O'War Farm Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...decisions on the Panel's Recommendations during a series of Governing Body (G8) meetings held between 10 and 15 August 2016, at which the Panel's Recommendations were considered alongside several reports which set out the proposed staff response to the Panel's recommendations. 1.4 In accordance with section 148(4) of the LGATPA, the Council is required to: 2. 2.1 2.2 2 a) publicly notify its decisions no later than 20 working days after it is provided with the rep...

5. Fish & Game - EiC - M J Trotter - Ecological Flow (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 397 KB]

   ...W., SHearer, K. A. & Stark, J. D. 1999. Changes in agricultural intensity and river health along a river continuum. Freshwater Biology, 42, 345-357. 30 Lange, K., Townsend, C. R., Gabrielsson, R., Chanut, P. C. M. & Matthaei, C. D. 2014. Responses of stream fish populations to farming intensity and water abstraction in an agricultural catchment. Freshwater Biology, 59, 286-299. 31 YOUNG, R. G. 1999. Trout energetics and effects of agricultural land use on the Pomahaka trout...

6. Proactive release - Electoral Amendment Bill No2 [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...checking individual donors against the elector register, or corporate donors against the Companies House register. 5 4us110oq65 2019-10-24 15:37:47 RE LE AS ED B Y TH E M IN IS TE R OF JU ST IC E IN CONFIDENCE 32. The party secretary is responsible for the party’s compliance with the donation rules. However, there is no requirement that a party secretary be resident in New Zealand. Having a party secretary based overseas may present enforcement challenges should the...

7. Matsuoka v E Tū Incorporated (Preservation Orders) [2018] NZHRRT 49 [pdf, 824 KB]

   ...Incorporated (E tO) is a union registered under Part 4 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 and Mr Matsuoka is one of its members. [2] As is his entitlement, Mr Matsuoka requested access to his personal information held by E to. The union did not make any response to that request. The Privacy Act 1993 (PA) deems such failure to be a refusal of the request. 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Matsuoka v E Ta Incorporated (Preservation Orders) [2018] NZHRRT 49] 1 [3] In his statement...

8. Wanoa v Wanoa - Succession to Rawiri Wanoa [2023] Chief Judge's MB 186 (2023 CJ 186) [pdf, 528 KB]

   ...on the matter. Following the hearing, the applicant sent through further whakapapa evidence on 16 January 2023. This evidence claimed that Ririu and Amohia are not sisters (as the respondents claimed), rather Ririu is an aunt to Amohia. In response to the submission, I directed that the respondents were to be given a chance to respond within 14 days from 19 January 2023. In response, the respondents expressed their confusion that submissions were still being accepted by the Cour...

9. Complaints Management Policy [pdf, 624 KB]

   ...the file is about must be obtained. In addition, the provider is obligated to respond under their professional obligations without further disclosure. Note: The Ministry may collect or disclose personal information about participants to meet its responsibilities under the Act, associated regulations, or any other relevant statute or court order. There are three different types of authorisations for disclosure of information that may be required from complainants other than legal aid p...

10. [2021 NZACC 148 – Sherborne v ACC (30 September 2021) [pdf, 389 KB]

    ...loss became the “best” and only treatment available to her in June 2016. As a result of the failure to offer proper treatment choices to Ms Sherborne at an earlier stage, she sustained a personal injury being permanent hearing loss. [83] In response to the question whether, if proper treatment had been undertaken, would a personal injury be sustained by Ms Sherborne, the Court answers “Yes”. [84] Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. The review decision dated 12 December 201...