Search Results

1. BORA Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment [pdf, 402 KB]

   ...discharging those agencies’ own functions and powers. The Bill also makes express provision for information assurance/cybersecurity and intelligence gathering in respect of New Zealand citizens and residents, but only with the joint approval of the responsible Minister and the Commissioner for Security Warrants, a quasi-judicial officer appointed under the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service Act 1969; 2.1.2 The Bill broadens the responsibilities and capacity of the Inspector-Gen...

2. CEIT Chair's practice notes [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...communicated to the applicant in writing • the case manager will arrange for the application and supporting material to be served on the respondent (insurance company and/or EQC) along with notice of the date for the first case management conference. Responses A respondent wishing to respond to the claim must file a response in the approved form and lodge supporting material with the Tribunal within 15 working days. The response must contain sufficient information to fully inform t...

3. Broughton - Kahurangi Trust (2021) 434 Aotea MB 131 (434 AOT 131) [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...been more focus on the trustees than on the management of the land, while expressing support for Ms Wotton. Ngā take Issues [6] The issue for determination is whether the trustees should be removed. The issue of whether an independent responsible trustee should be appointed in place of the current trustees was also canvassed at the hearing and that matter is also considered in this decision. He kōrero whānui Background [7] Ngatihaua number 23 is a block of Māori...

4. Auckland Standards Committee 5 v Stuhlmann [2022] NZLCDT 16 (2 June 2022) [pdf, 120 KB]

   ...DATE OF DECISION 2 June 2022 COUNSEL Ms E Mok for the Standards Committee Mr A Gilchrist for the Respondent Practitioner 2 DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL RE PENALTY [1] This hearing is to determine what orders we should make in response to the admitted charge of misconduct. The common tasks of assessing the gravity of the conduct, fitting the penalty to the profile of the practitioner, yet responding adequately to the need to reassure the public, all figure in th...

5. Cook v Legacy Church [2023] NZHRRT 31 [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] On 27 September 2019 Ms Cook’s lawyers sent a Privacy Act 1993 (PA, 1993)2 request to Legacy Housing’s General Manager for Ms Cook’s personal information relating to her tenancy (the IPP6 request). No response was received. [3] Following Legacy Housing’s lack of response to that IPP6 request, Ms Cook’s lawyer made a complaint to the Privacy Commissioner, but in respect of Legacy Church. The Privacy Commissioner conducted an investigat...

6. 2023-10-11-Rebuttal-Evidence-of-L-Dalzell.pdf [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...2023 mailto:david.allen@buddlefindlay.com mailto:thaddeus.ryan@buddlefindlay.com BF\64279718\1 Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 RESPONSE TO PROUSES .................................................................................... 1 RESPONSE TO EQUESTRIAN ADVOCACY GROUPS ......................................... 3 RESPONSE TO THE COUNCILS ...............................

7. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Williams [2012] NZLCDT 16 [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...right through to appeal. That defence appears to have been conducted on the basis that Ms Williams did not have direct knowledge, or knowledge that she could recall, of the actual transactions and invoices, but that as a professional she took responsibility for her employee’s actions. 4 [10] Because of the apparent conflict between these two approaches, at the outset of the penalty hearing the Tribunal asked to hear from Ms Williams on oath, to attempt to understand he...

8. OIA-121906.pdf [pdf, 915 KB]

   ...of 6 May 2025 requesting information relating to criminal legal aid providers under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act). On 15 May 2025, the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) emailed you to clarify parts of your request and received your response the following day. I have merged your original and clarified requests as listed below to simplify the response: 1. The number of contracted lawyers with approval as a criminal legal aid lead provider (not including limited approvals) a...

9. Allen - Pouto 2E4B1 (2014) Taitokerau MB 39 (79 TTK 39) [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...for the Registrar to give notice to them of my intended orders. They had until 31 July 2013 to raise any concerns with those intended orders. I later extended the time to respond to 31 August 2013. [9] Mr Haitoua did not respond. Eventually, a response was received from Linda McLean on 28 February 2014 to the following effect: I have not been into our property since 2000 due to threats about trespassing, locked gates, etc. I am not interested in paying a fifth share of roadway main...

10. OIA-122608.pdf [pdf, 814 KB]

    ...Judge. Eg Judge John Doe granted 40 final and 55 interim orders, while Judge Jane Doe granted 12 final and 33 interim orders. On 6 June 2025, the Ministry advised you that it does not hold data on judges’ decisions, and that you could expect a response no later than 7 July 2025. In response to part one of your request, please refer to Table 1 attached, which provides the number of people granted name suppression, by court location and suppression type from 1 s9(2)(a) s9(2)(...