Search Results

1. NZCVS Cycle 4 - Section 6 - Impact of COVID-19 pandemic [xlsx, 205 KB]

   ...other hand, when the confidence intervals of two estimates do overlap, the difference between the estimates is described as not statistically significant. This is a more conservative approach than a formal statistical test. Don't know/refusal responses Residual response categories such as "don't know" and "don't wish to answer" are generally excluded from analysis. This is generally the case for analysis of victimisation and rates of reporting victimisations...

2. NZCVS Cycle 4 - Section 8 - Distribution of Crime [xlsx, 224 KB]

   ...other hand, when the confidence intervals of two estimates do overlap, the difference between the estimates is described as not statistically significant. This is a more conservative approach than a formal statistical test. Don't know/refusal responses Residual response categories such as "don't know" and "don't wish to answer" are generally excluded from analysis. This is generally the case for analysis of victimisation and rates of reporting victimisations...

3. NZCVS Cycle 3 (2020) Section 6 Reporting to the Police [xlsx, 160 KB]

   ...other hand, when the confidence intervals of two estimates do overlap, the difference between the estimates is described as not statistically significant. This is a more conservative approach than a formal statistical test. Don't know/refusal responses Residual response categories such as "don't know" and "don't wish to answer" are generally excluded from analysis. This is generally the case for analysis of victimisation and rates of reporting victimisations...

4. Morris v Accident Compensation Corporation (Suspension of entitlements) [2024] NZACC 144 (2 September 2024) [pdf, 452 KB]

   ...reports were. Jacob underwent the Neuropsychological Assessment to determine if there were any residual cognitive impairments present (as a result of his concussion) which may prevent him from operating a crane safely. Due to bizarre results and responses to testing, a further assessment was recommended by a Neuropsychiatrist. This is scheduled for 21.10.17. However, despite the above, it was established that the Occupational Physiotherapist was unable to contribute anymore to the S...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 284 Director-General of Conservation v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...Environmental Effects prepared by Williamson Water & Land Advisory Ltd: Aupōuri Aquifer Groundwater Take Consent Applications, Assessment of Environmental Effects – Aupōuri Aquifer Water User Group. WWLA0184: Rev. 2, dated 27 February 2020 [and responses to s92 requests] Aupōuri sub-aquifer Area Group Means the Northern, Middle and South-western Groups formed following Environment Court proceedings ENV-2021-AKL-129, the boundaries of which are delineated on the map at Schedul...

6. Enabling-a-four-year-term-of-Parliament_Updated_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...Parliament would take effect following the next General Election (expected in 2029).This allows for appropriate implementation processes and protects the integrity of the democratic process. Proposed wording of the referendum question and options in response 30 In line with the Constitution (Enabling a 4-Year Term) Amendment Bill, I seek agreement to the wording of the referendum question and two options in response. Legislation will set out the wording of the question to be put to el...

7. OIA-124076.pdf [pdf, 931 KB]

   ...on notice were withdrawn by the applicant before being served? How many were served on notice? 5. How many of these applications were served on notice without confirmation from the applicant that they did not wish to withdraw their application? In response to the first part of your request, the applicant will be given the opportunity to discontinue their application before it is served. If the applicant wants to discontinue their application, they will need to file an interlocutory app...

8. Wellington Standards Committee v Hall [2014] NZLCDT 1 [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...charge at the time the charge was laid. [5] Ms Hall was obliged to respond to the charge once laid, stating which of the facts alleged in the charge were admitted and which were denied, and if the charge itself was admitted or denied.1 By her response dated 18 October 2011, Ms Hall denied the charge and the factual particulars alleged. 1 Rule 7 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Disciplinary Tribunal) Regulations 2008. 4 [6] Ms...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 075 McCallum Bros Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   McCallum Bros Limited v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 075 IN THE MATTER OF appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) BETWEEN MCCALLUM BROS LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-121) Appellant/Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge J A Smith Judge A H C Warren Commissioner S Myers Commissioner K Prime Special Advisor R Howie Hea

10. [2012] NZEmpC 73 Kelleher v Wiri Pacific Ltd [pdf, 46 KB]

    ...her challenge. Counsel were invited to confer on any outstanding issue as to costs, but no agreement was reached. Timetabling orders were made for the filing of submissions. Counsel for the plaintiff was to file and serve any submissions in response to the defendant’s application for costs by 30 April 2012. [2] An application for leave to extend the time for filing submissions was notified to the Registrar on 26 April 2012. A two week extension of time was sought. Counsel...