Search Results

1. Ahoy v Henare - Parengarenga 3G Ahu Whenua Trust (2015) 108 Taitokerau MB 66 (108 TTK 66) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...concerning documentation relating to the funds of the trust. On 12 September 2014, I issued a “Mareva” injunction freezing various bank accounts into which funds of the trust are alleged to have been paid. Further, on 15 December 2014, I appointed responsible trustees and advisory trustees to the trust following an annual general meeting held on 6 December 2014. [4] Mr Reeves first participated in the proceeding by filing a memorandum dated 16 October 2014. In Mr Reeves’ me...

2. Update to Minister on offenders deported to New Zealand [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...sharing between Australia and New Zealand is 3 The LCCSC consists of a maximum of two ministers from the Commonwealth of Australia, each state and territory of Australia and New Zealand with portfolio responsibility for law and justice, police and emergency management. The focus of the LCCSC is on developing a national and Trans-Tasman focus on fighting crime and promoting best practice in law, criminal justice and community safety, includin...

3. [2015] NZEmpC 62 Dynamic Meats 2014 v Hodges Allen [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...without the respondents’ involvement. Mr Ashley had been sent an email on 26 September 2014 confirming the date of the investigation meeting. The good faith report records that the email "was read" on Friday, 26 September 2014 but no response from the respondent was received by the Authority. The grounds of the application [30] The first ground advanced by Dynamic Meats in support of its application for an extension of time relates to service of the Authority’s p...

4. MacFarlane v Trustees of the K & T MacFarlane Whanau Trust [2014] Chief Judge’s MB 127 (2014 CJ 127) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...Lake Taupo Forest Trust pending the outcome of this application. 19. On 25 March 2013 an email was received from the Māori Trustee Office in Gisborne advising that they have referred my letter to the Māori Trustee Office in Wellington for a response. At the time of compiling this Report, no response has been received from the Māori Trustee. Reference to areas of difficulty 20. On the lower Court application to succeed to Ken MacFarlane, the information provided by t...

5. CAC 20006 v Spencer [2013] NZREADT 55 [pdf, 47 KB]

   ...communicate an offer by Beverley Callaghan and Bert Van Vliet (the complainants) for Lot 44 Alderton Park (Lot 44) to Wayne Brown its vendor. [b] Because of the defendant's failure to clearly communicate the complainants' offer, Mr Brown's response was “puzzling and not certain 2 enough in terms of the importance to the complainants of being able to purchase Lot 44 before selling their house ...”. [c] The complainants need to purchase Lot 44 was "pivo...

6. Riley & Arnoux v REAA & Carpenter & Quin [2013] NZREADT 38 [pdf, 45 KB]

   ...property’s lounge. She expected the agents to know local zoning rules. [14] She said she had asked both the second respondents more than once if they knew of any plans for the adjoining property to be subdivided and whether it could be subdivided. The response to Ms Riley was “no not that we are aware of”. [15] Ms Riley said she asked those questions each time she viewed the property and received the same answer from either or both the second respondents. The appellants the...

7. Koyama v New Zealand Law Society (Application by Defendant for Costs) [2013] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...and dismissing the plaintiff’s claim under the Privacy Act and striking out his claim under the Human Rights Act. The submissions by Mr Koyama [20] By submissions dated 13 February 2013 Mr Koyama complained about the late filing of the NZLS response, made mention of various alleged failings by the NZLS in the conduct of its case in the Court of Appeal, alleged that the NZLS had refused to participate in the mediation offered by the Human Rights Commission at first instance, alleged...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 196 Labour Inspector MBIE v Civic City Ltd [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...employment elements such as arrears of wages and holiday pay. [32] Another relevant consideration that was not originally touched on when the papers were filed, but on which further information has now been supplied to the Court, is the respondents’ response to requests or demands for compliance with the Authority’s determination. Even when, as here, a challenge is filed and served 3 (1989) 1 PRNZ 451. 4 [1996] 2 ERNZ 546....

9. BR v YD LCRO 64 / 2011 (9 May 2011) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...Lawyers and Conveyancers Act which provides that having regard to all the circumstances of the case further action was unnecessary or inappropriate. [17] In its decision, the Committee recorded the background to the matters complained of, the parties responses to the various matters raised and referred to the Costs Assessors report. It then provided a summary of the Committee’s deliberations in which - (a) it accepted the Costs Assessors findings; (b) it accepted assurances...

10. Nikau v Rongomau - Whangape Parish Lot 23B Horahora Marae [2012] Māori Appellate Court MB 300 (2012 APPEAL 300) [pdf, 132 KB]

    ...Hiwarau C. 5 4. Ms Nikau was entitled to defend the applications brought against her. 5. Ms Nikau had a tenable defence. 6. Judge Milroy failed to consider the apportionment of alleged deficiencies in the trust by in effect presuming total responsibility on the part of Ms Nikau. 7. Ms Nikau acted in good faith throughout. [11] Mr Hirschfeld also alleges that Judge Milroy took into account irrelevant matters: 8. A chance for Ms Nikau to have resigned before trial was irrel...