RQ & Anor v MZ LCRO 127 / 2011 (2 October 2012) [pdf, 108 KB]
...informed about the proposed road widening as he did not act for them. 4. The Committee determined that there was no obligation on MZ to do anything to remedy the waste water system malfunction. MZ was the Trust’s lawyer and assumed no personal responsibility for the Trust’s obligations as suggested by RQ and RR. 5. The Committee was unaware of anything that legally barred or prohibited MZ from acting for the Trust notwithstanding his personal friendship with RS. 6. The...