Search Results

Search results for response.

15752 items matching your search terms

  1. Auckland Standards Committee 5 v Blackman [2017] NZLCDT 11 [pdf, 35 KB]

    ...Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (Act). [6] The charge was filed by the Standards Committee on 24 January 2017. Ms Blackman was served by email on 27 February 2017. Proof of service has been filed. 3 [7] Ms Blackman has not filed a response to the charge and did not participate in a subsequent teleconference held on 13 April 2017. [8] Proof of the charge has been provided by the affidavit of Sarah Elizabeth Te’o sworn on 11 January 2017. In that affidavit an email...

  2. Shaw v Ngati - Huarere ki Whangapoua (2016) 130 Waikato Maniapoto MB 22 (130 WMN 22) [pdf, 111 KB]

    ...pursuant to Section 30(1)(b) of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 upon the following terms: i. Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Pu is the appropriate representative of Ngāti Pu for the purposes of representing Ngāti Pu before those local and public authorities responsible for planning, consent, regulation and environmental management at Whangamata and Hikutaia; ii. This order is conditional upon a review to ensure consistency with the outcomes of the pending Hauraki Collective Settlement; iii...

  3. 2021-03-16 Minute - PC7 - Expert Conferencing [pdf, 74 KB]

    ..._______________________________________________________________ MINUTE OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT PLAN CHANGE 7 Expert Conferencing (16 March 2021) _______________________________________________________________ [1] This Minute is issued in response to the memoranda filed by the Otago Regional Council dated 10 March, 12 March and 16 March 2021,1 and discussion in court held between parties yesterday, regarding expert conferencing. [2] Four expert conferences are to take place in...

  4. 2020-11-20-Minute-PC7-ORC-Recommend-Changes.pdf [pdf, 149 KB]

    ...COURT ORC RECOMMENDED CHANGES PLAN CHANGE 7 (20 November 2020) [1] This Minute is released for the purpose of case management and proposes a template for the Otago Regional Council’s use when recommending changes in response to submissions. [2] The Environment Court must give a decision on the provisions and matters raised in submissions. The decision must include the reasons for accepting, accepting in part and rejecting the submissions (RMA, F...

  5. Waikato River Authority.pdf [pdf, 156 KB]

    ...(“the Decisions Version”). 2. The WRA is the statutory body formed under the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010, the Ngati Tuwharetoa, Raukawa, and Te Arawa River Iwi Waikato River Act 2010, and with additional responsibilities arising under the Nga Wai o Maniapoto (Waipa River) Act 2012. 3. As part of its statutory function, WRA sets the primary direction, through the Vision and Strategy / Te Ture Whaimana o Te Awa o Waikato (“Te Ture Whai...

  6. Goldsmith - Kawarehe Trust (2003) 277 Rotorua MB 275 (277 Rot 275) [pdf, 135 KB]

    ...2001 to an allegation of mfsapproprfation of trust funds. I then issued a direction on21< November" 2003. that the existing trustees attend Court at the next hearing of the- matter to provfdeany details on the amounts involved, the persons responsible and the time period. I also directed the secretary to the Trust, Mr Goldsmith, to provide any details he could obtain as to the income of the Trust during the relevant time periods. Notice was duly given to the secretary by the case...

  7. Soil & Health Association of New Zealand 119 [pdf, 308 KB]

    ...local district plans pursuant to the RMA in respect of future land uses. (e) The Respondent has prepared its proposed district plan in accordance with section 74 of the RMA and has assessed the values of the community when developing a policy response and methods to manage the risks and effects from the release and use of GMOS in the district. (f) The Respondent judged the level of uncertainty and the complexities surrounding the risks of GMOs as a resource management issue....

  8. Form 25 Criminal legal aid fixed fees G [pdf, 377 KB]

    ...confirm that:  No other payment, remuneration or benefit has been or will be received in respect of this work (unless authorised by Legal Aid).  Any non-lawyer or supervised provider performed his or her work under my supervision and I am responsible for it.  I have advised Legal Aid of all charges I am aware of against the aided person named above.  If claiming hearing time I have records of all hearing time covered by this claim. Signature of lead provider Date...

  9. Form 25A Fixed Fees G [pdf, 366 KB]

    ...confirm that:  No other payment, remuneration or benefit has been or will be received in respect of this work (unless authorised by Legal Aid).  Any non-lawyer or supervised provider performed his or her work under my supervision and I am responsible for it.  I have advised Legal Aid of all charges I am aware of against the aided person named above.  If claiming hearing time I have records of all hearing time covered by this claim. Signature of lead provider Date...

  10. Form 27 Fixed Fees J [pdf, 126 KB]

    ...confirm that: • No other payment, remuneration or benefit has been or will be received in respect of this work (unless authorised by Legal Aid). • Any non-lawyer or supervised provider performed his or her work under my supervision and I am responsible for it. • I have advised Legal Aid of all charges I am aware of against the aided person named above. • If claiming hearing time I have records of all hearing time covered by this claim. Signature of lead provider Date...