Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 268 PMR Properties Ltd v Auckland Transport [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...The land is subject to a notice of requirement titled Rongomai Park to Puhinui Station (in the vicinity of Plunket Avenue) (the Requirement). The entire area of the land is subject to the Requirement. Auckland Transport is the requiring authority responsible for the Requirement. Application under s 185 RMA [3] PMR is the owner of the Land and was the owner of the land at the time Auckland Transport lodged the Requirement with Auckland Council on 9 December 2022. [4] Since Septembe...

2. Randle v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late appeal to the District Court) [2023] NZACC 122 [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...Initial Minute which directed that Mr Randle, by 16 June 2023, formally apply for leave to file the appeal out of time and set out the reasons why the appeal was filed late. Judge McGuire also directed that the Corporation file a memorandum in response by 30 June 2023. 2 [3] On 28 June 2023 (notwithstanding the above deadline), Mr Randle lodged his statement submitting that the appeal was filed late because he did not receive a copy of the Reviewer’s decision until 9 May 202...

3. 2024 NZPSPLA 049.pdf [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...allow Ms Viljoen to keep her COA so that she can keep her job. [6] Having considered all the information before me I am satisfied that grounds for disqualification now apply to Ms Viljoen and because of this she is no longer suitable to be a responsible security employee. It is not appropriate for someone to be a certificate holder while they are still serving a community-based sentence for dishonest offending from their employer. [7] However, I will delay the start of the canc...

4. [2024] NZEmpC 30 Stonewood Group Ltd v VGP [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...further submissions on the challenge from Stonewood are to be filed and served by 4 pm on Friday 1 March 2024. The defendant has also filed substantive submissions on the challenge, but, if he wishes, he may file and serve further submissions in response to those of Stonewood by 4pm on Friday 8 March 2024. [9] The current hearing date is vacated. Stonewood is to advise the Registrar if it is content for the matter to dealt with on the papers. If it continues to seek a hearing of...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 218 Poyner v Auckland Council [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...communication with Auckland Council regarding in-accordance changes and consenting considerations for the proposal under Chapter D18 Special Character Areas Overlay - Residential and Business (SCAO) in the AUP(OP). [5] Having sought the Council’s response, the Court received confirmation from the Council on 20 August 2024 that it did not oppose the stay application and that it did not consider granting a stay would result in significant effects on the environment. It further req...

6. 2024] NZEmpC 208 Allied Investments Limited v Jones [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...with on its merits. In the circumstances, I considered it just to make an interim order for stay pending consideration of the company’s application for a stay. As I explained, this would enable the defendant an opportunity to file a considered response to the company’s stay application and to address the issues raised in the affidavit filed in support of it. [6] The plaintiff had identified the possibility of their stay application being dealt with on an agreed basis, namely b...

7. Separation agreements & Orders

   ...you separated from your former partner, you can ask the Family Court for a Separation Order. What is a separation agreement? This is when you agree with your former partner and you are both clear about when the relationship ended, and what you are each responsible for, such as: caring for children, paying a mortgage, looking after pets or dividing property. The time you’ve been separated for is important in divorce proceedings. You need to prove you have been separated for 2 years or more,...

   Located in:

   1. Family >
   2. Separation & divorce

8. Rangatahi Courts & Pasifika Courts

   ...two Pasifika Courts in Auckland. Who they are for The Rangatahi and Pasifika Courts are for young people who have admitted the charges they are facing. After the Family Group Conference (FGC) has decided on a plan for how the young person can take responsibility for what they did, as well as working out how to make sure the young person does not offend again, the young person may be given the opportunity to have this plan monitored by the Rangatahi or Pasifika Court. The FGC may recommend...

   Located in:

   1. Youth Court >
   2. About Youth Court

9. Non-discrimination standards for government guidelines [pdf, 392 KB]

   ...factors in the “public function” test include whether the organisation is: • acting in the public interest; • conferring a public benefit; • acting to implement or in furtherance of government policy or strategy; • under special obligations or responsibilities that other (private) bodies do not have • receiving or involved with public funding (although this is not determinative on its own) • exercising powers under statute or regulation. For example, the provision of boarding...

10. Ruapuha Uekaha Hapu Trust - Hauturu East 8 Block (2008) 134 Waikato MB 3 (134 W 3) [pdf, 10 MB]

    ...Trust and to account to the beneficiaries for same in accordance with Clause 9 hereof and to disburse suchfimds as the Court shall by fill'ther order direct. [57] I have not included B.3. and B.6. as they are objects relating to the interiIn responsibilities of the trustees until a full trust order is put in place. [58] I also note that the parties have no issues ill relation to objects B.!., B.4. and B.s. FUlthermore, the various arrangements or agreements referred to ill object...