7300 items matching your search terms
...The complaint [8] Ms OLL’s complaint was founded on the following claims. [9] Ms OLL came to New Zealand to study on 22 February 2010. The earthquakes in Christchurch affected her study. Following the second earthquake on 22 February 2011 she moved to Auckland to continue her study. [10] The earthquakes pe
...The Tribunal has upheld the complaint, as it is satisfied Ms Navarette-Scholes failed to respond using professional business practices when she became aware of the complaint regarding the unlicensed associate. The complaint [5] The Registrar’s Statement of Complaint put forward the following background as the basis for the complaint: [5.1] Ms Navarette-Scholes was the director of ANZSIIS International School (AISL), and a licensed immigration adviser. She had a colleague (the associ...
...hearing he had the right to cross-examine his ex-wife on every piece of the information which she had provided to the Police in the preceding years and which allegedly showed she had consistently lied to them. See for example Mr O’Hagan’s written statement of evidence (Exhibit 1, para 19): 19. It is my belief and understanding that I had the right to cross-examine the complainant on every detail of the information she had provided to the police as a way of validating this informatio...
...retrieved by the parties from the Authority if they are to be produced at the Court hearing. This only refers to documents which Ms Dent produced at the investigation meeting as exhibits. However, she has taken it to include briefs of evidence, statements of problems, minutes and other administrative papers of the Authority. [13] Having spoken to Ms Dent at the hearing on 31 May 2017, I believe she now understands that not all of these documents can be produced at the hearing bef...
...[4] On 25 September 2013 the respondents, as plaintiffs in ARC 77/13, filed a challenge to parts of the Authority’s determination but have elected to proceed other than by hearing de novo. The time for the Labour Inspector to file and serve a statement of defence is still running. [5] On the afternoon of 17 October 2013 the Labour Inspector filed an application for a freezing and associated orders which were referred to a Judge and considered immediately. The Court identified, b...
...to be heard on 1 November 2006. [15] On 30 October 2006, Mr Wood contacted Mr McVeigh and advised him that he was abandoning the application. Mr Wood filed a Memorandum in the High Court recording this abandonment, and including the following statement: “The Plaintiff is legally aided and cannot take this matter through a defended hearing and wishes to discontinue the application letting costs lie where they fall” [Bundle reference 0034] [16] The next day, 31 October 2006...
...Counsel: Anjela Sharma, counsel for plaintiff Paul McBride, counsel for defendant Judgment: 16 September 2011 SUPPLEMENTARY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] The plaintiff seeks recall of the Court’s judgment to deal with his claim for interest which was not addressed in the substantive judgment. Although counsel for the plaintiff has couched the request as an inquiry about why interest was not awarded, the real thrust of Ms Sharma’s submission is that interest...
...14.7(d). unjustified disadvantage and written submissions filed in advance clarified the arguments being advanced on her behalf. [10] The plaintiff seeks a contribution to her costs of $2,106.22, representing 66 per cent of claimed actual costs. I accept that the plaintiff incurred actual costs of the quantum identified in submissions and supported by invoices before the Court. The costs claimed by the plaintiff do not include the costs associated with an a...
...[2015] NZERA Auckland 155. 3 At [8] – [9]. 4 At [14]. of the hearing relating to Mr Southall’s defence of Mr Tuau’s personal grievance; or an award should be made in such sum as the Court saw fit. [8] Following service of the statement of claim, no statement of defence was filed or served for Mr Tuau. The Court accordingly directed that Mr Southall was entitled to a hearing of his challenge, it being proposed that this be dealt with on the papers by the filing...
...along the front of a Mitsubishi motor vehicle being driven by Mr Ian Phillips. Mr Phillips‟ vehicle was stationary in Martin Road waiting to cross over the intersection. [3] Later that same day, Ms Katz completed an insurance motor accident claim form for the defendant in which she admitted responsibility for the accident stating in explanation: “Just didn‟t see vehicle”. [4] The police attended the scene and on 11 June 2009, Ms Katz was issued with an infringement no...