Search Results

1. Turner v Itchyfoot Pty Ltd [2021] NZHRRT 27 [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...information, or matter that may, in its opinion, assist it to deal effectively with the matter before it, whether or not it would be admissible in a court of law. [14] While not sworn, in our view there is no prejudice to either party if the written statements of evidence filed in the proceeding are taken into account. It is also appropriate for the Tribunal to consider the documentary evidence filed by both parties. [15] The evidence on which the Tribunal bases its decision is a...

2. AB Ltd v ZY [2014] NZDT 589 (4 March 2014) [pdf, 33 KB]

   ...2013 between the parties in relation to the purchase of a Mazda MPV 1995 for the amount of $4,995.00. The total payments payable under the financing contract were stated as $8,589.99. A security interest was taken over the car by the lender. It claims that the debtor defaulted on the contract on 4 August 2013 and states that it issued a pre-repossession notice dated 11 August 2013 for the amount of $5,650.48. The debtor then returned the car on the same day since as she felt she...

3. BORA Iwi and Hapii of Te Rohe o Te Wairoa Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 15 MB]

   . · CroWiile Kara una Law 2 December 2016 Attorney-General Iwi and Hapii of Te Rohe o Te Wairoa Claims Settlement Bill (PCO 18973/5.19) - Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 Our Ref: ATT395/263 1. We have considered the Iwi and Hapu o Te Rohe o Te Wairoa Claims Settlement Bill ("the Bill") for consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 ("the Bill of Rights Act"). We advise the Bill appears to be consistent with the Bill of Ri...

4. ID v SN [2024] NZDT 171 (18 April 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...stated that “All rust done.” Some photos were also provided. ID did not purchase the car at that time. It was May of the following year that ID again asked about SN’s [vehicle]. 13. I am not satisfied that it is reasonable for ID to rely on statements made approximately 10 months prior to the purchase of the car regarding its condition. It is reasonable to assume that the car has suffered further wear and tear during that time, and it would be unreasonable to expect it to be in...

5. [2007] NZEmpC AC 15/07 Gates v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 35 KB]

   ...[6] The reasons for the adjournment of the earlier trial date in July 2005 are set out in the Chief Judge’s decision and arose because of the defendant’s need for time to address the new matters raised by the plaintiff, the need for an amended statement of claim to be filed by the plaintiff, the underestimate of the length of the fixture and the plaintiff’s pursuance of her legal aid application. There may also have been some outstanding issues of disclosure. [7] Again whils...

6. Legal aid fixed fees schedule for the Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 500 KB]

   ...settlement / record of settlement, including costs  arranging payment  closing files  reporting to client  reporting to and invoicing for Legal Aid (include copy of agreed settlement). * This is a repeatable activity and can be claimed per occurrence of this activity. 2 | P a g e F r o m 1 M a r c h 2 0 1 5 Investigation Activity Fees Tasks Provider Advocate Completion and filing of Statement of Problem $260 $180 For  taking instruct...

7. Employment relations authority updated 29 Sep 22 [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...settlement / record of settlement, including costs • arranging payment • closing files • reporting to client • reporting to and invoicing for Legal Aid (include copy of agreed settlement). * This is a repeatable activity and can be claimed per occurrence of this activity. 2 | P a g e F r o m 1 M a r c h 2 0 1 5 Investigation Activity Fees Tasks Provider Advocate Completion and filing of Statement of Problem $260 $180 For • taking instruct...

8. [2010] NZEmpC 36 T & L Harvey Ltd v Duncan [pdf, 49 KB]

   ...find that this requires a further $1,400 plus GST to be disregarded. [9] I note here that Mr Norris apparently did not charge the defendant for his time attending the telephone conference with me on 24 June 2009 or for subsequently preparing the statement of defence. While that is curious, it is entirely a matter between Mr Norris and his client. There is no scope for awarding a contribution to costs not actually incurred. [10] The next issue I address is that the defendant was ch...

9. [2021] NZREADT 11 - Beath v The Real Estate Agents Authority, Mike Pero Real Estate Ltd, Kemp & Scoble (22 March 2021) [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...any) (“the Administrator’s emails”); [d] Oral evidence to be given by a solicitor acting for the Agency and the licensees (Mr Napier); [e] Oral evidence to be given by one of the vendors of the property (Ms Dinh); and [f] An emailed statement by Ms Amy Washbourn (co-purchaser of the property with Mr Beath and originally a co-complainant) to an Authority investigator, Mr Radovich. [17] We record that the emails referred to in sub-paragraph [a], above, were before the Co...

10. A Q v Mudaliar [2015] NZIACDT 76 (23 June 2015) [pdf, 185 KB]

    ...when the second section 61 request failed; and [2.3] Whether he was required to have a further agreement for the section 61 requests. [3] The Tribunal found each of those aspects of the complaint established. The complaint [4] The Registrar’s Statement of Complaint put forward the following background as the basis for the complaint: [4.1] The complainant engaged Mr Mudaliar to assist with immigration matters. Between 15 February 2013 and 10 June 2013, he assisted with a work visa...