Search Results

1. Regulatory Impact Statement on the Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal [pdf, 296 KB]

   Regulatory Impact Statement on the Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Minister of Justice 30 January 2018 Approved by: Ruth Fairhall, GM CJSP File number: CRT-48-01 Purpose 1. This note provides information on the attached Regulatory Impact Statement, which sets out our analysis of this proposal. It will accompany the Cabinet paper when it is considered by Cabinet, and will be published when the Bill is introduced to the House. 2. The RIS is a departmental docum...

2. N Trust v NE [2023] NZDT 210 (24 May 2023) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...[2023] NZDT 210 APPLICANT HN, HC and TO, as trustees for the N Trust RESPONDENT NE The Tribunal orders: NE is to pay HN, HC and TO $25,062.17 within 28 days. Reasons [1] The applicants, as trustees of the N Trust, claim from NE arrears of rent and other expenses outstanding under a lease. Their claim, as landlords, is that NE is liable under a personal guarantee for the obligations of the tenant, T Ltd (“TL”), of which NE was a director. The company is...

3. [2016] NZEmpC 158 Kidd v Beaumont [pdf, 460 KB]

   ...Relations Act 2000 (the Act). Mrs Kidd is not now a plaintiff. 1 Kidd v Beaumont [2016] NZERA Auckland 64. The pleadings [5] It is appropriate to refer to the pleadings (the latest statements of claim and defence) in the case because these determine the relevant issues between the parties. The Court was not provided with the statements of problem and reply which would have been before the Authority. At least until the...

4. Tsai Mao TRI 2016-100-00010 [2018] NZWHT AUCKLAND 01 [pdf, 491 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2016-100-00010 [2018] NZWHT AUCKLAND 01 BETWEEN PHORINA CHIEH-HSIN TSAI AND FERGUS TI-WEN MAO First Claimants AND UPPER HUTT CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND MICHAEL ANTHONY BARROTT Second Respondent AND MICHAEL DANIEL KEANE (REMOVED) Third Respondent AND PANELCRETE CONSTRUCTION LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 40222) (REMOVED) Fourth Respondent AND PHILLIP ERIC GORRIE AND ROBYN JUNE BOND Fifth Respondent A

5. [2010] NZEmpC 108 MacBeth v Cookie Time Limited [pdf, 22 KB]

   ...made a joint application to remove the matter into the Court for hearing and determination. The Authority granted that application on 7 December 20071. [5] In the Court, the matter initially proceeded in the usual way. On 24 January 2008, a statement of claim was filed. A statement of defence was filed on 26 February 2008. I then held a telephone conference with counsel on 10 April 2008, the outcomes of which were recorded in a minute issued the following day. The plaintiff...

6. Darby Trust v Auckland Council & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 22 [pdf, 115 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2011-100-000050 [2013] NZWHT AUCKLAND 22 BETWEEN VAUGHAN STUART DARBY AND MARY ANN DARBY as Trustees of the DARBY TRUST Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent AND ANTHONY LAWRENCE ALLEN Second Respondent AND CEDRIC DUDLEY FRENCH Third Respondent AND DARYN MCDONALD (Removed) Fourth Respondent Decision: 29 July 2013 DECISION AS TO COSTS Adjudicator: P A McConnell

7. [2025] NZREADT 08 - OQ v Knowles & Maclean (21 March 2025) [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...for compensation. On 12 June 2024 and 16 July 2024, the Authority filed memoranda setting out its views on the interpretation of the Act and the Tribunal’s jurisdiction and powers as applicable to the referral. On 30 August 2024, OQ filed a statement of claim. On 30 October 2024, the Authority filed a bundle of the documents that were before the Committee when it made its decision. [26] On 30 September 2024, the Tribunal issued a further Minute No 2 setting out further timeta...

8. Varela v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 30 (19 March 2014) [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...given by the complainant and upheld the complaint. The Tribunal’s finding is that the adviser failed to perform her duties and allowed an unlicensed person to unlawfully carry out her responsibilities. The complaint [4] The Registrar filed a Statement of Complaint with the Tribunal; it sets out the facts alleged in support of the complaint and information gathered by the Registrar. [5] The background to the narrative is that the complainant and a person, who is not a licensed immigr...

9. [2013] NZEmpC 82 Tan v Morningstar Institute of Education Ltd t/a Morningstar Preschool [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...revenue and that there was a temporary cashflow difficulty, but, I find, had no reason to suppose that the financial situation was in any way serious. [6] There was a staff meeting, which Mr Tan asserts took place on 18 July 2011, in which he claims to have told the staff that the management was experiencing serious financial problems. I find that he told the staff there were revenue problems and that as a result the directors had decided that, unlike 2010, they could not afford...

10. [2011] NZEmpC 96 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 177 KB]

    ...to the Court of Appeal, the fraud proceedings were filed on 17 March 2009. These proceedings sought orders that the findings, directions, orders and decisions of Judge Shaw in the proceedings WRC 17/04 and WRC 19/05, which are detailed in the statement of claim, were obtained for the benefit of the defendant by fraud, that they be set aside and be of no further effect and the defendant be held in contempt of Court and pay a fine. The plaintiff also sought to have the statements of...