Search Results

1. [2021] NZEmpC 141 Employees v Attorney-General [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...if they fail to have their first vaccination by 26 August 2021, the date specified for certain workers under the COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order 2021 (the Order). An injunction is sought prohibiting such action. [2] A statement of claim, and associated applications for interim orders and for urgency, were filed by the applicant on the afternoon of 16 August 2021. The respondent is named as the Attorney-General (apparently on behalf of all employer...

2. KB v MY [2019] NZDT 1390 (29 May 2019) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...the right and collided with the right front corner of his car. 4. Ms B and her insurance company lowered their claim slightly at the hearing today to $11,891.60, being the loss after her vehicle was deemed uneconomic to repair. 5. Mr Y claims $3010.70 for the repairs to his vehicle (although it does not appear that his counter-claim was formally lodged with a filing fee paid) – the hearing proceeded on the basis CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 that the content of both...

3. [2018] NZEmpC 31 Ahuja and ors v Labour Inspector MBIE [pdf, 311 KB]

   ...mobsters had come to their home and threatened them not to show up in Court. [8] Employee A and her husband corroborated each other in material respects as to what had transpired and what was said. Their evidence included their written statements to the Court and also contemporary written statements to the Police that were exhibited. [9] Employee A also gave evidence that after she had laid a complaint with the Labour Inspector and at a time after proceedings had been...

4. [2020] NZEmpC 60 Noble v Ballooning Canterbury.com Ltd [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...but had stayed there from time to time when visiting New Zealand, and that he did not know where Mr Noble was living, or in which USA state he resided. [19] A notice of opposition was filed. It asserted under the rules of procedure that the statement of claim as originally filed on behalf of BCL’s client had met the necessary requirements as to an address for service for Mr Noble, so there was no breach of duty. Reliance had been placed on the Anti-Money Laundering and Count...

5. AD v ZX LCRO 87 / 2010 (14 December 2010) [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...much that is of relevance to the matters in hand, given that the Applicant was acting for New Zealand employees who presumably would have been employed by New Zealand companies. [40] The other matter of some significance, is the fact that the Statement of Problem as amended by the Applicant, included a claim of joint employment by all of the companies within the Group, and not merely the employer named in the employment contract. [41] The Respondent submits that this approach ca...

6. 2015 Ministry of Justice annual report - report in relation to selected non-departmental appropriations [pdf, 329 KB]

   Report in relation to selected non-departmental appropriations Statement of service performance FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2015 The statement of service performance describes the outputs provided during the 2014/15 financial year for selected non-departmental appropriations. The appropriations, and reporting requirements, are specified in the Estimates of Appropriations for 2014/15. An explanation is provided for service performance variances over 10%. Unless otherwise stated, where...

7. [2016] NZEmpC 11 Titoki Securities Trust v Wallace costs [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...1 Titoki Securities Trust v Wallace [2015] NZERA Auckland 394. [3] The plaintiff opposes the defendant’s application for costs on grounds including that she “is not legally represented”. The plaintiff also submits that the costs claimed by the defendant were either incurred unnecessarily or do not relate to this proceeding. It says that it has always made clear to the defendant that its challenge was filed for the express purposes of preserving its rights of challenge...

8. BN & MN v Hakaoro [2013] NZIACDT 51 (15 August 2013) [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...properly provided. [8] The Tribunal has found Mr Hakaoro failed wholly to provide the professional services he charged for; he was dishonest and misleading, and failed to meet minimum professional standards. [9] The complaint has been upheld. THE STATEMENT OF COMPLAINT [10] The complaint has been filed by the Registrar, in the form of a Statement of Complaint. Material facts [11] The Registrar identified the material facts that founded the complaint in his Statement of Complaint....

9. Carey Clan Trust v Still [pdf, 197 KB]

   1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2009-101-000022 BETWEEN CAREY CLAN TRUST Claimant AND REX STILL First Respondent AND SUSAN STILL Second Respondent AND TAURANGA CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND CGAF LIMITED T/A BAY INSPECTIONS (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND THE BUILDING ADVISORY BUREAU NZ LIMITED (BAB) (Removed) Fifth Respondent AND KENRICK BUCKLEY (Removed) Sixth Respondent AND WESTERN COATINGS LIMITED Seventh Respondent AN

10. TQ v ON [2022] NZDT 242 (21 November 2022) [pdf, 144 KB]

    ...ensure that the other party is fully informed about the transaction, therefore, the seller need not disclose all material facts to the purchaser, and silence will not usually amount to a misrepresentation. However, when a party makes pre-contractual statements, those statements must be correct. Although the party may have been legally justified in remaining silent about a matter, by venturing to make a representation about it, that, that representation must be a full and true statement, an...