7300 items matching your search terms
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 607 BETWEEN AG Ltd APPLICANT AND ZT Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 6 May 2014 Referee: Referee Costigan ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZT Ltd (the respondent) is to pay AG Ltd (the applicant) $1,144.25 on or before 20 May 2014. Facts [1] AG Ltd (the applicant) agreed to hire a stand to ZT Ltd (the respondent) at the [industry event] in 2013 for $2,288.50. It
...employment relationship was with IR, not Madison. [4] Briefly summarised, it is alleged that IR and Madison entered into a Master Services Agreement, under which Madison provided certain services, as stipulated in a managing document and “Statements of Work” (SoW); and that workers who entered into employment agreements with Madison were then required by it to provide certain services to IR, according to a system which regulated the manner in which Madison workers would work...
...defendant and to the defendant’s counsel. It was for this reason that the discontinuance of proceedings was filed. [10] Following the attempted filing of the notice of discontinuance the plaintiffs were directed to file and serve an amended statement of claim with the correct particulars of the plaintiffs. Once that had been done, if it was the position that those plaintiffs did not wish to proceed, a further notice of discontinuance should be filed. Mr Yukich advised the Cou...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 88 APPLICANT NL APPLICANT UN RESPONDENT ME The Tribunal orders: ME is to pay NL and UN $15,000.00 on or before Wednesday 6 July 2022. Reasons: 1. On 19 August 2020, ME provided a pre-inspection report on [Address] that NL and UN relied upon when bidding on the house. This report stated at page 15 that the concrete si
...“subsequently discovered misconduct” on the part of Ms George which may affect the remedies that would otherwise have been awarded to her, should she be successful in her personal grievance claims. The Council has expressly pleaded in its statement of defence to the personal grievance claims that, if the defendant is liable to the plaintiff, it will seek to reduce the remedies to be provided to Ms George by reason of her subsequently discovered conduct in breaching her employme...
...justice system deals with people can say a lot about the society it serves. This Ministry has an integral role in New Zealand’s justice system. We provide justice policy advice to the Government, we negotiate the settlement of Treaty of Waitangi claims, we house New Zealand’s largest criminal law firm – the Public Defence Service – we administer legal aid, and we administer New Zealand’s courts and tribunals. We lead the justice sector, and support an integrated sector throu...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-100-000036 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 27 BETWEEN VIVIENNE DIANA LOWE, GRAHAM BRENTLEIGH BOND and LORRAINE LILA BARTLEY as Trustees of the VIVIENNE HICKS FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND ROGER MORRISON First Respondent AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Second Respondent AND STUART SAVILL (KERIAN SAVILL removed) Third Respondents AND MAJORIE and ROBERT JANSEN Fourth Respondents AND PLASTER SYSTEMS LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND MA
...supporting papers. research reports from other inquiries were also placed on the Whanganui record of inquiry. With substantial research now to hand, the tribunal required counsel for the various claimant groups to coop- erate in the production of a joint statement of claim on common issues and separate particularised statements of claim on behalf of each group.18 The Crown’s statement of response set out its position.19 From these documents, the tribunal produced a ‘statement of iss...
...supporting papers. research reports from other inquiries were also placed on the Whanganui record of inquiry. With substantial research now to hand, the tribunal required counsel for the various claimant groups to coop- erate in the production of a joint statement of claim on common issues and separate particularised statements of claim on behalf of each group.18 The Crown’s statement of response set out its position.19 From these documents, the tribunal produced a ‘statement of iss...
...of law posed by the Employment Relations Authority under s 177 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). The Authority considers it necessary to obtain the answer to the question before it continues further with its investigation of the claims of the New Zealand Meat Workers Union Inc (the Union) against South Pacific Meats Limited (SPML) and Michael Talley. 1 [2] Literally almost on the eve of the hearing, the defendants changed solicitors and counsel so that the synopsis...