Search Results

1. AAH v ZZT [2012] NZDT 39 (15 October 2012) [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...may be used on grapes. The apparent opinion of the Respondent, ZZT, is that if the Applicant’s product is included in the “spray schedule” complied by XY Ltd for its principal, [the wine growers association], that should be accompanied by a statement that: “use of this product may affect flavour and aroma of the wine.” The Applicant objects to that view or position of the Respondent, on behalf of his employer, and claims that it has suffered loss as a result of the publicati...

2. Wellington v MacDonald - Te Maika B4 Residue (2008) 129 Whangarei MB 258 (129 WH 258) [pdf, 6.1 MB]

   ...Whenua Maori Act 1993 ("the Act") to prevent his sister Rose fi'om selling Te Maika B4 Residue. A hearing took placc on 20 December 2006 when I granted an interim injunction. The proceedings was then adjourned for the substanti ve claim to be considered. [3] Joseph filed a Statement of Claim dated 31 January 2007. In it he alleged that Rose rece ived the shares fi-om their father, Henare, "as a trustee for the deceased's grandchildren and great grandchildren...

3. [2013] NZEmpC 144 Jerard v Wildbore [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...Relations Authority (the Authority). He also made a claim for arrears of wages and holiday pay. The Authority sustained those claims and awarded him remedies totalling about $11,500. Ms Jerard challenged the whole of that determination in a statement of claim filed on her behalf by counsel, Ms Coulston, who had then been recently instructed. [3] It was clearly signalled in the Authority’s determination that Ms Jerard had not participated to any extent in the investigation. Acc...

4. The Proprietors of Maraeroa C v NZ Forest Products Ltd (2007) 121 Waikato MB 258 (121 W 258) [pdf, 4.1 MB]

   ....nJDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER THE PROPRIETORS OF MARAEROA C BLOCK And Ors V NZ FOREST PRODUCTS LTD And Drs MLC A20060028 157 [22 March 2007J Introduction [1] This judgment is concerned with whether this Court has the jurisdiction to hear the claims brought by the applicants and whether arbitration is the proper forum for such claims to be determined. [2] The first applicant (UMaraeroa C"), second applicants (UPukemakoiti") and third applicants ("Te Rongoroa"...

5. [2022] NZEmpC 145 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [pdf, 940 KB]

   ...community that concluded in a report of July 2021 that there was no employment relationship between the community and its members. The pleadings [20] Against that background, it is necessary to consider the details contained in the plaintiffs’ statement of claim, and in the second defendants’ statement of defence. The pleadings define the issues for admissibility purposes.5 [21] In their statement of claim, the plaintiffs contend they were not volunteers, but employees,...

6. [2020] NZEmpC 194 Samuels v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...Relations Authority. He has appeared in the Authority a number of times. Mr Samuels is not a qualified lawyer. He appears as an advocate, as he is entitled to do under the Employment Relations Act 2000.1 [2] Ms Lang succeeded in her claim and a number of orders were made against her previous employer, Gourmet Foods Limited.2 Issues arose from Mr Samuels’ perspective when the Authority came to determine costs. He was concerned that the Authority Member had made sev...

7. Broadman - Waimarama 3A 4B Sec 5 (2018) 66 Tākitimu MB 207 (66 TKT 207) [pdf, 332 KB]

   ...owners within two months, to provide an update and to consider the appointment of a replacement trustee. [6] Philip Pinckney of Staples Rodway Ltd chartered accountants was subsequently appointed auditor.7 Mr Pinckney filed the audited financial statements of the trust on 7 November 2016, in relation to the years ending 31 March 2013 and 31 March 2014, which 1 68 Napier MB 17 (68 NA 17) 2 142 Napier MB 141-143 (142 NA 141-143) 3...

8. LCRO 107/2023 NC v PJ (30 November 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...hoped that an apology will allow you both to put the events of the teleconference behind you. Application for review [22] The applicant’s application for review, which is particularised at considerable length, is adequately summarised in his statement of the outcome he is seeking: A finding that [the respondent’s] conduct was at least “unsatisfactory conduct” and that he would be appropriately censured – this is a serious threat of ongoing 2 J v A LCRO 31/2009 (30 April 2...

9. LCRO 024/2018 NN v AE (23 April 2019) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...1 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, r 5.11. 3 he put forward three options for consideration by Ms NN for response by 4.00 pm that day. First, he and Mrs SL would claim compensation in the [Disputes] Tribunal; secondly, he would complain to the Law Society about Ms NN’s conduct; and thirdly, they could settle the matter themselves thereby allowing Ms NN to apologise for her “error”. [13] Nine...

10. Taia v Taia – Taia Whānau Trust (2015) 132 Waiariki MB 146 (132 WAR 146) [pdf, 217 KB]

    ...sought. Coraglen and Tania had 21 days from receipt of that material to file submissions in response. Judge Harvey warned that if they failed to respond they would be removed. Judge Harvey also directed the Registrar to obtain copies of bank statements for accounts referred to during the hearing. [11] Notice was sent to Coraglen and Tania as directed. On 16 September 2014 Coraglen and Tania filed a joint submission opposing their removal, and opposing the partial termination of...