[2018] NZEmpC 143 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 316 KB]
...[2008] NZEmpC 53. [11] Relevancy must first be considered with regard to the pleadings, since these define the scope of the issues before the Court. It is therefore necessary to describe the causes of action as raised by Mr Lorigan’s statements of claim. [12] Mr Lorigan’s first challenge is concerned with the question of whether he raised a disadvantage grievance within 90 days, as required under s 114 of the Act. According to his pleading, the focus of the issue wi...