Search Results

1. The Māori Trustee v Greening – Pirikotahi 9A2, 9B1, 9B2A and 9B2C2 (2013) 60 Taitokerau MB 78 (60 TTK 78) [pdf, 71 KB]

   ...Judgment: 06 June 2013 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER 60 Taitokerau MB 79 Introduction [1] This decision addresses whether the second respondent, Rio Greening, is entitled to pursue a counter-claim against the Māori Trustee after the Māori Trustee has withdrawn his application. Background [2] The Māori Trustee brought two applications before the Court. Although the two applications proceeded in tandem, this decision is onl...

2. DW and AW v EQC and State Insurance [2019] CEIT-2019-0001 [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...therefore, has until 17 July 2019 to file their response and supporting documentation. EQC has not yet taken any formal steps to oppose the application but State Insurance has filed an application seeking: (a) Further particulars of DW and AW’s claim against State Insurance. (b) An extension of time until 31 October 2019 for State Insurance to file and serve its response to the claim. (c) A deferral of the first case management conference until the first available date aft...

3. Waitangi Tribunal bibliography part 1 2019 [pdf, 406 KB]

   ...information and insight into Crown-Maori relations from 1840 to the present day. This version of the bibliography is complete until the end of 2011. As we finish our large district historical inquiries and move our focus to contemporary and kaupapa claims it will continue to be updated to include further reports and evidence produced as part of our ongoing inquiry programme. Official Tribunal reports can already be viewed on our website soon after they are released. It is intended...

4. Waitangi Tribunal bibliography 2018 part 1 [pdf, 403 KB]

   ...information and insight into Crown-Maori relations from 1840 to the present day. This version of the bibliography is complete until the end of 2011. As we finish our large district historical inquiries and move our focus to contemporary and kaupapa claims it will continue to be updated to include further reports and evidence produced as part of our ongoing inquiry programme. Official Tribunal reports can already be viewed on our website soon after they are released. It is intended...

5. 2010 to 2013 Ministry of Justice statement of intent [pdf, 498 KB]

   1 E.64 SOI (2010) Statement of Intent 2010–2013 Ministry of Justice Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to Section 39 of the Public Finance Act 1989 CROWN COPYRIGHT © ISSN 1175-8414 (print) ISSN 1178-6914 (online) This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand licence. In essence, you are free to copy, dis...

6. Abraham v Auckland City Council [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...titles have issued to reflect the subdivision of the land upon which ultimately five dwellings were built (Units 1, 2 & 3 No.4 Fitzroy Street, and 39 & 39A Brown Street), and the necessary creation of leasehold interests. The witness statement of the Claimant Ms Abraham in its paras [46] to [56] under the heading “Ownership and development of the land/ tracing the titles” lists and describes the various relevant “Certificates of Title” and copies of the “Composi...

7. [2010] NZEmpC 79 Silver Fern Farms Ltd v North [pdf, 50 KB]

   ...Authority concluded that although an amended claim or amended claims may have been lodged with it after that three year period, it was the filing of the original proceeding within the three year period that satisfied the test. Mr North’s amended statement of problem did not raise any new substantive issue but, rather, included a claim for leave to file out of time in exceptional circumstances if this was required. That issue of compliance with the three year time limit has not b...

8. LCRO 184/2015 WD v YR (6 July 2017) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...WD had terminated the retainer. (b) He had fulfilled his instructions which were to stay the WD’s bankruptcy and obtain a settlement offer from their former lawyers. (c) He carried out further work on a pro bono basis, including drafting a statement of claim, because of Mr WD’s financial situation. (d) Mr WD “fired” him then changed his mind, but Mr YR refused to be re- engaged.8 5 Email WD to YR (31 March 2014) at [3]....

9. [2012] NZEmpC 27 Taylor v Milburn Lime Ltd [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...correct that the hearing was adjourned twice but the second adjournment was totally unavoidable. In respect of the first adjournment, I fixed costs at the time. [8] The defendant’s reluctance to settle is unsurprising given that the plaintiff’s claim had been entirely rejected by the Authority. [9] Other than to make those points, Mr Beck has provided no material to assist me in deciding what costs it was reasonable for the plaintiff to have incurred. In particular, I have n...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 45 Williams v Rural Livestock Ltd [pdf, 307 KB]

    ...the whole of this employment relationship problem to the Court pursuant to s 178 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). [2] Consequent on that decision the parties were directed to file pleadings. The plaintiff filed a statement of claim on 6 November 2019 in which he claimed, among other things, not having been paid: (a) his annual bonuses said to be due and owing to him under his employment agreement with the defendant for 2015 and 2016; (b) the full amount o...