Search Results

1. [2025] NZEmpC 54 Secretary for Education v Post Primary Teachers Association Te Wehengarua [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...been dealt with, the remainder of the substantive removed proceedings will need to be timetabled to a hearing as soon as practicable. Directions made [10] At this stage the following directions are made: (a) The PPTA is to file and serve its statement of claim in relation to its removed proceedings by 4pm on 25 March 2025. (b) The PPTA is to file and serve its notice of opposition to the Secretary’s application for leave to commence proceedings, and its submissions on the fi...

2. [2010] NZEMPC 51 How v Campin & Campin T A Chequers Stud [pdf, 32 KB]

   ...Mr How concedes he refused to sign) describing the employer as “J. W. Campin – Chequers Stud.” A brief of evidence from the above named defendant Mark Campin, which was provided to the Authority and also the Court, contains the following statement: I manage Chequers Stud at Maungatautari Road, Cambridge. My father James Campin and my brother Chris Campin are also involved with the business. Essentially, the business is a family business and has operated for many years. [...

3. HB Ltd v NH & KX [2017] NZDT 1452 (11 April 2017) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...NZDT 1452 APPLICANT HB Ltd T/A BB Parts RESPONDENT NH SECOND RESPONDENT KX The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. KX is to pay HB Ltd trading as BB Parts $2,013.03 by 4pm on 26 April 2017. 2. HB Ltd trading as BB Parts’ claim against NH is dismissed. Reasons 1. HB Ltd, trading as BB Parts (APPCO), had given a credit account to UT Ltd (UT), which was guaranteed by UT’s sole director NH. KX was an employee of UT. He purchased a number of items on UT’s...

4. CH v SU [2024] NZDT 868 (5 December 2024) [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...in her defence, I have read her submissions to the Registrar of 24th June 2024 and importantly the email to the registrar with the eight points provided on the morning of the hearing. Additionally, I have viewed with the remaining photographs and statements filed by SU and in particular the statement with 32 points and the timeline. Whilst many of the points as raised by SU and heard by me at the hearing on 3rd December are logical CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 5 and can be s...

5. Waitangi Tribunal Report on the Aotearoa Institute claim concerning Te Wānanga o Aotearoa [pdf, 748 KB]

   ...Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 .2  Background to the claim and the structure and focus of the report  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Chapter 2 : The Concept of a Wānanga 2 .1  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....

6. BU v YA LCRO 153 / 2010 (21 April 2011) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...held, are those of a reasonable conveyancing practitioner possessed of the factual material available to the solicitor whose actions are under scrutiny. [31] In the complaint and application for review, the Applicant incorrectly attributes these statements to the Simperinghan decision (ibid). That case involved a negligence claim against the plaintiff’s lawyer for failing to recognise whether a caveatable interest 7 existed. It does not particularly refer to the test requ...

7. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Sensible Sentencing Group Trust (Application by NZ Herald for Access to Tribunal File) [2013] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...however, the hearing of the interim order application took place in open court. The public gallery was full, if not overflowing with representatives from the media. In these circumstances it would seem artificial to treat the affidavits, witness statements and submissions referred to at the hearing as not being governed by the post-hearing access regime. Accordingly copying is to be permitted in relation to the statement of claim, the statement of reply, applications, affidavits, witnes...

8. [2017] EmpC 156 Coomer v JA McCallum & Son Ltd [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...but costs of $4,500 were awarded against him. The Authority ordered Mr Coomer to pay those costs to JA McCallum & Son Limited within 10 days of the date of the determination.1 He is challenging that decision as wrong in principle because, he claims, he was successful and should be entitled to an order for costs. [2] This proceeding is a de novo challenge to the Authority’s determination. It was dealt with on an agreed statement of facts and by written submissions. If Mr Coom...

9. [2021] NZEmpC 102 Crossen v Yangs House Ltd [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...a claim to minimum entitlements and giving up (or compromising) the rights/ability to pursue that claim? (c) Depending on how those issues are determined, what is the effect of s 131 of the Act? [11] As is evident from Mr Holderness’ statement of issues, there were two strands to the arguments for Mrs Crossen. The first strand was that, properly construed, the settlement agreement had not compromised Mrs Crossen’s claims for statutory minimum entitlements. The second...

10. ME v TK [2014] NZIACDT 39 (25 March 2014) [pdf, 95 KB]

    ...Zealand and the Minister made it clear why his actions were inappropriate. He persisted. [3] He then lodged an appeal out of time; it could not be filed, and he did not refund the filing fee to the complainant. [4] The adviser did not challenge the statement of position setting out the complaint. The Tribunal has upheld the complaint. The complaint [5] The Registrar filed a Statement of Complaint which identified the factual background as: [5.1] The adviser began representing the...