Search Results

Search results for statement of claim.

7304 items matching your search terms

  1. Tawera v Tawera – Waitangi A1A2 (2014) 39 Tairawhiti MB 45 (39 TRW 45) [pdf, 188 KB]

    ...refused to vacate when served with a notice to quit and similarly refused to quit in 2012. By 2013, the applicant says he is owed approximately $7000. [13] The applicant noted that at all times the insurance was paid by himself. [14] The applicant claims that in November 2008, the respondents refused to vacate the property so as to allow Pekama and his family to resume occupation of it. Thus he took legal advice and a letter to vacate dated 27 October 2009 was sent to the respondents...

  2. Insley v Butler - Awanui Haparapara no 2B no 1B sec 2 (2022) 227 Waiariki MB 35 (227 WAR 35) [pdf, 404 KB]

    ...8.1125 shares. [6] The Awanui Haparapara 2B1B2 Ahu Whenua Trust was created on 10 August 2017.2 The current trustees are Bronwyn Ngatai, Gayle Ngatai, Michael Insley, Shannon Payne and Wharehaua Butler.3 Agreed facts [7] The parties provided a statement of agreed facts with regard to the background to this application. These are summarised below.4 [8] In 1942, Te Ao Butler and Tom Butler (“the Butlers”) came on to the land to farm it (and other additional land) under a lic...

  3. Maurice Edward Aston Trust [2012] NZWHT Auckland 1 [pdf, 90 KB]

    1 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 01 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6778: MAURICE EDWARD ASTON, BARRY FOSTER SHANNON, JOHN LITTLE & JOHN GEORGE SWAN as Trustees of the MAURICE EDWARD ASTON TRUST - 180C Sutherland Road, Lyall Bay ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Mr As...

  4. LCRO 160/2017 EH v FP (23 April 2018) [pdf, 192 KB]

    ...Service (NZLS), dated [DATE], about the way Mr FP conducted himself in authorising the contractor to use the accessway to gain access to, and carry out work on adjacent [House 3]. [12] He alleges that Mr FP made misrepresentations, misleading statements and had a conflict of interest, which in his view constituted misconduct. He sought: (a) Mr FP’s removal, as a trustee of the trust, and to have no “further involvement related to the accessway”; and (b) confirmation tha...

  5. BORA Limitation Bill [pdf, 285 KB]

    ...under the Bill of Rights Act, which is limited by the extension of limitation periods to that Act in cl 11(2)(c); and 1.2 The right of non-discrimination on the grounds of ethnicity, which might be seen to be limited by the separate provision for claims in respect of Maori customary land (cl 26). 2. The Bill, which replaces the Limitation Act 1950, provides for the clarification and certain substantive changes to limitation periods for civil claims. In particular, the Bill: 2.1 Replace...

  6. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 60 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 638 KB]

    The Tribunal’s Mohaka ki Ahuriri Report was presented to claimants at Te Haroto Marae on the Napier-Taupö road on Saturday 5 June 2004. It covers 20 Hawke’s Bay claims spanning a district bounded by the Tutaekuri River to the south, Hawke Bay to the east, the Waiau River to the north, and the inland ranges and the old Hawke’s Bay provincial boun- dary to the west. The claimants are predo- minantly Ngäti Ka- hungunu, although some identify more or equally with Ngäti...

  7. [2014] NZEmpC 83 Wilson v Wilson [pdf, 198 KB]

    ...[3] Prior to the substantive hearing, there were issues as to whether the correct defendant(s) had been cited. The plaintiff initially sought judgment against the second defendant only; ultimately the plaintiff filed and served a second amended statement of claim which cited the first defendant company, Bruce Wilson Painting & Decorating Limited, and the second defendant, Bruce Wilson t/a Wilson Painting & Decorating. Although the primary issue is the identification of the c...

  10. [2007] NZEmpC AC 39/07 Toll NZ Consolidated Ltd v Rowe [pdf, 22 KB]

    ...pursuing its challenge and the parties have agreed on a date of hearing at the end of August. The case has been given a priority fixture and it is desirable that a judgment on the challenge should be issued expeditiously. [8] Having read the statement of claim and the statement of defence and counter claim in reply, I have no doubt that it is a bona fide challenge and there are issues which are important to the parties with which the Court must deal. Because of the defendant’s...