Search Results

1. LW v XE [2023] NZDT 96 (10 March 2023) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...The application is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 5 October 2022, LW purchased a 2006 [redacted] vehicle from XE for $6,300.00 after seeing it advertised on Trademe and then viewing the vehicle on 1 October 2022. The advertisement included the statement “[e]ngine warning light is on has been scanned comes up with fault at intake manifold however vehicle runs and drives very nice up to new owner to fix that issue” and at the viewing of the vehicle on 1 October, XE gave to LW a copy...

2. Beauchamp v B & T Co (2011) Ltd (Application for Interim Non-Publication Orders) [2019] NZHRRT 46 [pdf, 440 KB]

   ...customers and those customers have remained supportive of the defendants. Reliance is placed on the affirmation of Pamela Rowe who annexes four documents disclosed by the defendants in the discovery process. Those documents comprise four witness statements provided by regular, longstanding customers of Adzuki Bean Café. In each case they express their support for Ms Du. The authors specifically acknowledge they are aware of the complaint made by Ms Beauchamp and express continuing su...

3. Q Ltd v SN & TT [2024] NZDT 628 (19 August 2024) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...accept the [Bank] offer. They ceased using BS, and went with another insurance broker. 6. Q Ltd issued an invoice for $1,600.00. SN and TT disputed the invoice. 7. The claim in this Tribunal originally sought 1,600.00. BS increased the amount claimed to $1,999.00. The claim came before me by way of a re-hearing granted by Referee Johnson on 11 July 2024. The hearing took place by phone on 8 August 2024. Both parties participated in the hearing. Findings 8. SN and TT disput...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 71 Bowen v Bank of New Zealand [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...Zealand (BNZ), to the Employment Court. The Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) declined her application for removal of those proceedings to the Court.1 [2] The application for special leave is based on two grounds: (a) Ms Bowen’s claim raises important issues of law that are not incidental to her claim; and (b) there are related proceedings before the Court. 1 Bowen v Bank of New Zealand [2019] NZERA 11 (Member Robinson). [3] Ms Bowen’s substantiv...

5. [2023] NZEmpC 126 Caisteal An Ime Ltd v A Labour Inspector [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...the Authority’s determinations set aside; (b) a stay of the Authority’s orders; (c) to impose a penalty on the Inspector; and (d) compensation for “hurt and humiliation” allegedly caused by the Inspector’s actions. [14] These claims were based on alleged breaches by the Inspector of ss 69AAH, 114, 159AA, 229(5) of the Act, ss 6, 12 and 15 of the Official Information Act 1982 and an unspecified provision of the Privacy Act 2020. [15] The Inspector did not accept t...

6. NU v OA [2023] NZDT 748 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 224 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 748 APPLICANT NU RESPONDENT OA The Tribunal orders: The claim by NU against OA is partially proved. OA is to pay NU the sum of $590.58 on or by 5:00 pm on 20 January 2024. Reasons 1. On 13 February 2023 (after storm Gabrielle) at around 10:30 am, NU (the applicant) found that a large Jacaranda tree (the tree) had crashed over...

7. [2017] NZEmpC 64 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...that they did at LSG premises are relevant. Relevant also is any work that they did during the period of their claims for any other employers/clients or clients of either of the third parties. She further submitted that the plaintiffs’ bank statements are the most reliable record of income derived from their work in the circumstances which prevail in this case. She also submitted that the plaintiffs have not been able to provide full documentation relating particularly to thei...

8. Karena v Allen - Te Koau A (2016) 55 Takitimu MB 148 (55 TKT 148) [pdf, 355 KB]

   ...further and better particulars of the allegations made and evidence in support by 23 October 2015, following which the trustees would have one month to reply. 1 On 13 May 2016, counsel Mr Calver was given a further opportunity to file an amended statement of claim by 3 June 2016 and any evidence by 22 July 2016. 2 [4] The amended application was filed on 2 June 2016. The applicant now seeks: (a) An order reviewing the terms and operation of the trust per s 231 of the Act; (b)...

9. Security Information in Proceedings Bill [PDF, 1.1 MB]

   ...order excluding all persons except for the parties and other specified persons while the security information is being considered in the substantive proceeding; or an order requiring redacted information, summaries of the security information or a statement of the facts that the security information establishes, provided those documents do not disclose the security information itself. 13. In deciding what orders to make, the Court must consider the following matters:3 13.1 whether the...

10. Auckland Standards Committee v RDM [2015] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 100 KB]

    ...granted on 11 July 2013 to CEF, the youngest son of EPF and the widow. The Practitioner’s Role [15] The widow consulted the practitioner very soon after the death of her husband. She received advice about her life tenancy and about making a claim to the estate under the Property (Relationships) Act 1976. The practitioner engaged in correspondence with Guardian Trust about possible options for administration of the estate if it were to renounce its executorship. He encouraged...