7290 items matching your search terms
...discrepancy was the matter that then came to occupy Ms XY’s mind, because she had settled that particular aspect of her claim against Mr SR for $150,000 in 2008 based on the premise that the $300,000 2 Statement of Claim, clause [17]. 3 Letter MZ to SR (27 March 2015). 4 From Mr SR. 3 recorded in the deed was correct. There is no evidence that explains when Ms XY first saw the schedule. [8] However, presumably based on...
...to be discussed. Ms Nepe did not attend. In a Minute issued on 6 June 2023 Ms Nepe was specifically advised that she was expected to attend the next teleconference. She was also advised that her next step would require the filing of an amended statement of claim against the WCC. [5] Ms Nepe attended the next teleconference held on 17 July 2023. In the Minute issued following that teleconference, the Tribunal directed Ms Nepe to file and serve an amended statement of claim by 18 A...
...upheld the defendants’ claims. The plaintiff was ordered to pay Ms Tuckett $620 for wages and $3,934.75 for holiday pay. Mr Parr was awarded $640 for wages and $1,147.70 for holiday pay. [4] On 28 November 2012, Mr Kavanagh filed a filed a statement of claim on behalf of the plaintiff. In that original statement, the plaintiff sought to challenge only some parts of the Authority’s determination. In it, Mr Kavanagh said I am happy to pay holiday pay but I have evidence that...
...defendant, 3rd defendant etc) [Note please: the names of the parties should coincide with the names written on the determination of the Employment Relations Authority that is challenged] To the defendant And to the Registrar of the Employment Court Statement of claim 1 I, the plaintiff, by filing this statement of claim, am commencing in the Employment Court at ………………………………………. [place] an action against you in which I seek from the Employment Court [specify the...
...numerous interlocutory applications, three directions conferences and an unsuccessful judicial settlement conference. Broad directions have been given for a substantive hearing but a fixture cannot be allocated until the scope of the plaintiff’s claims are settled by deciding the application to strike out many of them. Background [3] From the material currently before the Court, the following background summary of events can be distilled. As it is derived from untested...
...Police response under Information Privacy Principle 6. The Certificate recorded the opinion that there had been no interference with privacy. [2] In March 2017, the plaintiff filed proceedings under the Privacy Act (PA) in the Tribunal. The statement of claim alleged that the Police had interfered with the plaintiff’s privacy by failing to provide requested personal information in contravention of Principle 6. In particular, that the plaintiff should have been provided with the...
...18/08 26 May 2008 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 18/08 ARC 1/08 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file an amended statement of claim BETWEEN ERIC NELSON Plaintiff AND FLETCHER STEEL LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 26 May 2008 (Heard at Auckland (in Chambers)) Appearances: Ken Nicholson, Counsel for Plaintiff Carl Blake, Counsel for Defendant J...
...11 December 2008 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 19A/08 WRC 27/08 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a compliance order AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by the defendant for an order striking out the plaintiff's statement of claim BETWEEN LYNNE FRANCES SNOWDON Plaintiff AND RADIO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 12 November 2008 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: R A Moodie, Counsel for Plaintiff M F Quigg and J Bates, Counse...
...GJ Goodwin, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mrs K Apostolakis in person The intended first, second and third defendants were not heard DATE OF DECISION: 7 September 2017 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL THAT INTENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR FILING 1 Introduction [1] On 17 July 2017 Mrs Apostolakis presented for filing in the office of the Tribunal a statement of claim dated 13 July 2017. The claim is made under the Privacy Act 1993....
...This decision was appealed to the Court of Appeal but leave was refused. [4] The plaintiffs then applied to the Authority to have their substantive personal grievances removed to the Court. This was denied. The plaintiffs next filed amended statements of claim in the Court in November 2007. The defendant has now applied for orders striking out part or whole of the amended statements of claim. The applications [5] The defendant seeks the following orders: 1. That the aff...