Search Results

1. [2016] NZEmpC 116 Owen v Chief Executive of the Dept of Corrections [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...unjustifiably disadvantaged. The Employment Relations Authority dismissed the grievance for reasons set out in a determination dated 26 July 2016. 1 [2] The applicant decided to challenge the Authority’s determination. Steps were taken to file a statement of claim on 24 August 2016. Filing was declined on the basis that it was one day out of time. 1 Owen v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [2016] NZERA Au...

2. HRRT Statement of Reply (Privacy) [pdf, 236 KB]

   P a g e | 1 STATEMENT OF REPLY Step 1. Defendant(s) (please provide your details) Name ________________________________________________________________________________ First Middle Surname Phone/mobile number ___________________________________________________________________ Preferred contact option for this reply. Please choose one and give th...

3. [2007] NZEmpC AC 24/07 Jeffries v Adis International Ltd [pdf, 47 KB]

   ...would be punitive to her given her personal circumstances and her decision to represent herself at the Authority. [5] The Authority found that the plaintiff had delayed pursuing her rights and that this, together with the multitude of breaches claimed by her, had contributed to the very high costs incurred by the defendant. In setting costs the Authority stated it had had regard to the submissions and all matters relevant to the conduct of the hearing, taking into account that...

4. NZ Private Prosecution Service Ltd v Key (Application for Disclosure Order No. 2) [2015] NZHRRT 24 [pdf, 39 KB]

   ...Ms Bailey. [2.2] The contact details of counsel for Ms Bailey. [2.3] Confirmation of “the date that Amanda Bailey was served with all the documents filed by the Plaintiff”. [2.4] Confirmation that Ms Bailey has or has not filed a separate statement of claim. [2.5] That the Tribunal serve Mr McCready (NZPPSL) with any documents filed by Ms Bailey or Unite Union. [3] It is to be remembered Ms Bailey is not a party to these proceedings and that these proceedings have been brought...

5. [2007] NZEmpC AC 50/07 Service and Food Workers Union Inc v Spotless Services (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 30 KB]

   ...Appeal. Particulars of pleadings [17] Finally turning to particulars, I agree that Spotless should admit or deny whether it prevented affected employees from working but, equally, it can only do that if such an assertion is made expressly in the statement of claim. As I understand the position, Mr Cranney will now include an allegation to this effect in which case the defendant will have to address that specifically. [18] I accept also that the defendant’s current reference to...

6. Turner v University of Otago (Costs) [2021] NZHRRT 48 [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...[44] Whether costs to be awarded [44] Quantum [46] ORDER [56] 3 INTRODUCTION [1] Following a six day hearing the Tribunal by decision in Turner v University of Otago [2021] NZHRRT 18 (25 March 2021) dismissed in their entirety the claims made by Dr Turner in her third statement of claim dated 15 January 2016. [2] The University of Otago now by application dated 29 April 2021 applies for an order that Dr Turner pay costs of $138,948 (excl GST) which represents two-third...

7. Wai 2180 Taihape inquiry newsletter 4 Jan 2017 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Kohitātea The Rangitīkei winding north past Mōkai flats, Taihape Nga mihi o te tau hou ki a koutou katoa Nau mai, haere mai ki tenei pānui tuawhā Page 2: Ngā Kōrero Tuku Iho, Week 3 Page 3: Research update Page 5: Statement of Issues Page 6: Hearing programme Page 8: Staff update Tēnā koutou katoa New Year’s greetings to all and welcome to the fourth issue of the Wai 2180: Taihape district inquiry pānui. In this issue we reflec...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 139 Brown v Richard & Jennifer Adams t/a Untouchable Hair & Skin [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...conclusion reached by the Authority regarding an NMIT invoice. The challenge was 1 Brown v Richard & Jennifer Adams t/a Untouchable Hair and Skin [2014] NZERA Christchurch 58. commenced by a statement of claim on 7 May 2014; Ms Brown filed a statement of defence on 10 June 2014. [3] In this proceeding (CRC 17/14), the applicant filed an application for leave to file a cross-challenge out of time on 10 June 2014 supported...

9. UM v QO [2022] NZDT 252 (12 December 2022) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...provides that if a party is induced into a contract by a misrepresentation made by another party to the contract, the injured party is entitled to damages as if the misrepresentation was a term that had been breached. A misrepresentation is a false statement of fact, even if made innocently. 8. A misrepresentation is best explained as being a false statement of fact. An opinion and statements about some future performance are generally not statements of fact. Inducement refers to be...

10. Employment Court forms & fees

    ...paying, the Court fees please let the registry know.  There is a form that you can fill in which will be referred to a Judge for a decision. Please use this Form. You should fill out the form and give it to the registry when you go to file your claim (filing fee) or before the dates for the hearing are confirmed (hearing fee). Make sure you provide information about your financial position to help the Judge decide whether you should pay the fee or not, or that it should be reduced or payme...

    Located in:

    1. Employment Court