Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 68 KAQ v Attorney-General [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...Standing back and considering the matters in rr 12 and 13, and the authorities I have referred to, I consider it to be in the interests of justice to grant limited access to the Court file. [22] Access is granted to the primary pleadings, namely the statements of claim. I record that no statements of defence were filed by the time the notice of discontinuance was filed, and so no statement of defence or substantive response to the statements of claim is held on the Court file. I...

2. Milligan v Robert Brown Developments Ltd [pdf, 133 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 00756 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN KAYE BARBARA MILLIGAN Claimant AND ROBERT BROWN DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (Now struck out) First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 19 August 2004 Appearances: Garry Thompson, counsel for the Claimant Stewart Ross in person for the Second Respondent Peter Smith and John Mulholland for the Third Re...

3. Jones v Sircombe [pdf, 43 KB]

   ...(replacement) $ 89.99 c. Delivery of Batts $ 40.09 d. Check wiring at time of re-roofing $125.21 Replacement costs $13,739.38 18. Also claimed were laboratory quality tests $166.63, and tank water $340.00; $56.25 being half the cost of initial legal advice; $1,043.75 being half Mr Beattie’s costs for his report, and the cost of his appearance at the tribunal; $100.88...

4. Hill v Whimp [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...have. The Claimants have a second claim in contract alleging 22 that under the Sale and Purchase Agreement Mrs Whimp gave warranties relating to work being done in accordance with the permit and obligations under the Building Act. It was claimed that she breached those warranties. After repeating the established law on limitation for contract and tort claims (and confirming that the First Respondents were only raising the limitation defence for the contract claim) he asserts...

5. [2011] NZEmpC 77 Mercer v Maori TV Services [pdf, 70 KB]

   ...case by the fact that, as Mr Edwards accepted and the Authority’s determination of costs demonstrates, the defendant incurred $24,375 for attendances between 8 October 2008 and 16 March 2009, in respect of the plaintiff’s claim for interim reinstatement and the investigation of his personal grievances in the Authority, over a two full day period. The defendant in the Authority sought a total of $17,975 as a contribution towards those costs. The Authority in its determination o...

6. Templates

   Statement of claim Originating application Notice of appeal Order adjudicating debtor bankrupt Application for a writ of habeas corpus Statement of defence Statement of defence and counterclaim Statement of counterclaim Statement of cross-claim Statement of claim against a third party Notice of cross-appeal Affidavit...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court >
   3. Going to court without a lawyer >
   4. Representing yourself in a civil case in the High Court

7. DL v WR & WQ LCRO 39 / 2011 (29 September 2011) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...received inadequate representation and poor advice leading to an unjust award. The matters complained of involved: 1) Lack of preparedness. 2) Lack of advice. 3) Lack of diligence in spreadsheet analysis. 4) Not taking cognisance of their statements that the landlords were lying. 5) Not detailing the options sufficiently. Telling Mrs DL that she had no option whatsoever. 6) Engaging a barrister who wasn‟t comprehensively briefed and who appeared to have a mindset that the...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 85 Crest Commercial Cleaning Ltd v Total Property Services (Canterbury) Ltd [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...than the disadvantage Total Property may suffer if an extension of time is granted. This proceeding was described as a test case because s 69OEA has not previously been considered by the Court. [9] The application was accompanied by a draft statement of claim. The proposed pleading asserts that Total Property breached ss 69OEA(2), 69OEA(3)(a) and (b)(i) and 69OEA(5) of the Act.12 The claim is that despite iterative requests for information, Total Property did not provide what...

9. CEIT Practice Notes 2022 [pdf, 460 KB]

   ...Notes 2022 1 | P a g e Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Chapter 1 - Commencing Claims ......................................................................................................... 3 Applications ..........................................................................................................................

10. Mahanga v Sade - Horahora 1A1 (2017) 148 Taitokerau MB 237 (148 TTK 237) [pdf, 140 KB]

    ...order, file in the Court an affidavit of documents in form 7 and serve a copy of the affidavit on the party who obtained the order; and (b) allow the party who obtained the order to inspect any document except a document for which privilege is claimed. (5) If privilege is claimed for any document, the Court may inspect the document for the purpose of deciding whether the claim of privilege is valid and may rule on the claim. [8] When considering an application for discovery, the...