Search Results

1. [2020] NZEnvC 124 Sidwell v Thames Coromandel District Council [pdf, 5.7 MB]

   ...judgment as to whether or not he be granted any revival of his subdivision consent and/or capacity to seek any lapse extension.2 [1 O] For its part, TCDC has filed evidence from various TCDC officers. Primarily, that was to rebut Dr Sidwell's claims and put TCDC's position on matters such as TCDC Transcript, pp 4-5. 4 engineering standards, the activity status for any new subdivision application and the capacity for this to be consented. [11] That background provides...

2. [2025] NZEmpC 152 Tillmans Fine Furniture Ltd v Rookes [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...Relations Act 2000); b. Tillmans’ views about Ms Rookes’ performance and Tillmans’ decision to terminate under the 90 day trial period, invalidated the fixed term agreement; and c. Ms Rookes’ employment was one of ongoing employment. Agreed statement of facts [5] To assist the Court’s review of the Authority’s determination counsel filed an agreed statement of facts: 1. Ms Rookes was employed as a Sales Consultant by Tillmans Fine Furniture Limited (Tillmans) pursu...

3. David Bain appendices tabs F to J [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   Ta F BETWEEN J U STICE IAN BINNIE Interviewer AND MILTON WEIR I nterviewee Date of I nterview: 1 9 Ju ly 20 1 2 Place: John Wickliffe House, Duned in Attendees Annabel Markham (Crown Law Office) INTERVIEW OF MILTON WEI R ( IN RESPECT OF C LAIM FOR COMPENSATIO N BY DAVID CULLEN BAIN) BINNIE J : Good morn ing M r Weir. M R WEIR: Good morning. 5 BINNIE J : Thank you for coming, I appreciate it. I have here a bible and if you wou ld swear in answer to the q

4. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v CAL2012-E000627 [2013] NZCOP 9 [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...Act, the Applicant identified the alleged infringements by the Respondent in respect of which it sought an order from the Tribunal, as the five instances of alleged infringing file sharing referred to in the enforcement notice. [16] The Applicant claimed the sum of $215.10 for each of the five alleged infringements. It also claimed an additional sum of $3,000, together with the fees it had paid to Slingshot for the issue of the infringement notices ($143.75), and the application fee...

5. Tait v Kruger - Tauarau Block (2021) 252 Waiariki MB 180 (252 WAR 180) [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...of the whānau, the matter has largely been ignored by chairperson Paki Nikora and other trustees. [27] The respondents also highlighted the related application to remove them as trustees, which was heard before Judge Harvey. The respondents claimed the Court dismissed the application on the basis of “legal prejudice and the over-arching mana of hapū will and opinion”. [28] In this context, the respondents say they have not been openly invited to participate in trustee mee...

6. [2016] NZEmpC 103 Lewis v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...19.2 to 19.7. [41] If the collective agreement applied to this cleaning work, the members of this crew would be entitled to a weekly minimum payment if their earnings would not have otherwise reached that minimum. None of the pre-op crew made a claim for this weekly minimum payment for work undertaken in October 2014 or in previous seasons such as in 2011/2012. The opportunity to make such a claim must have arisen for the work undertaken on 17 October 2014, when the season was an...

7. Powell - Tunapahore 6 (2015) 130 Waiariki MB 160 (130 WAR 160) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...Gage, Rangi Koroua and Bella Savage were the successful nominees. [3] Katarina Powell now objects to their proposed appointment on the grounds that the meeting of beneficiaries was conducted improperly. She sets out three reasons to support her claims. First, she says that the Deputy Registrar refused to accept proxies at the meeting which she alleges was contrary to past practice. Mrs Powell, in a written complain to the Registrar dated 15 September 2015, pointed out that she and...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 73 Carter Holt Harvey Limited v Rodkiss [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...at the [applicant’s] Nelson saw mill. The [respondent] pursued personal grievances alleging that he had been unjustifiably disadvantaged in the course of his employment and unjustifiably constructively dismissed. The Authority sustained his claims of disadvantage but determined that he had not been constructively dismissed. The [respondent] was awarded compensation of $6,000. [3] The application for stay is supported by an affidavit of Mr G J Andrews. The applicant’s conc...

9. Thomas v CAC304 & Anor [2016] NZREADT 17 [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...and so Mr Lang drafted some additional clauses, in his own hand, to add to the further terms of sale. These included completion of additional works on the property, erecting boundary fences and a concrete pad for parking. [3] Mr Thomas’s initial statement, which was a written response to a complaint, suggested that it was Mr Lang who gave him the additional clause. His brief of evidence for the Tribunal said that it was Ms Loveridge who dictated the clauses to Mr Thomas. [4] Howeve...

10. AP v Standards Committee X LCRO 317 / 2012 (15 August 2013) [pdf, 67 KB]

    ...The Standards Committee resolved to inquire further. The complaint was notified to the Applicant who, in her response of 19 July 2012, queried whether the [Standards Committee X] had jurisdiction to decide the matter. She nevertheless offered a statement “under duress” acknowledging that the complaint was a serious allegation. The Applicant outlined some of the background leading up to the 1 Letter of complaint to NLZS, 10 May 2...