Search Results

1. Addressing-Stalking-in-NZ_Final-pack.pdf [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   © Crown Copyright, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Hon Paul Goldsmith Minister for Justice Proactive release – Addressing stalking in New Zealand Date of issue: 31 January 2025 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 04. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, th

2. [2010] NZEmpC 32 Maritime Union of NZ v Ports of Auckland [pdf, 100 KB]

   MUNZ V PORTS OF AUCKLAND AK 29 March 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2010] NZEMPC 32 ARC 17/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MARITIME UNION OF NEW ZEALAND INC Plaintiff AND PORTS OF AUCKLAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 24 and 25 February 2010 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Simon Mitchell and Tim Gray, Counsel for Plaintiff Richard McIlraith and Kylie Dunn, Counsel for Defendant

3. Rolleston v Moore - Lot 1 Deposited Plan South Auckland 52401 and Ongaonga No 1C No 1 Block (2016) 133 Waikato Maniapoto MB 39 (133 WMN 39) [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...cross-examined by counsel for the respondents and also asked questions by the Court. His quote is attached to this decision as Schedule “A”. [11] On 2 December 2016, counsel for the respondents filed a memorandum of counsel. Attached to that was a statement by Mr Frank Harawira dated 30 November 2016. Mr Harawira is a nephew of the respondents who has experience farming, fencing and building. His evidence was that he would be able to repair the fence at the expense of the...

4. Cross v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claim for personal injury, revocation of cover) [2024] NZACC 58 [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...Held at: Wellington/Whanganui-a-Tara by AVL Appearances: M Williams for the Appellant T Lynskey for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 8 April 2024 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for personal injury – ss 20, 25, revocation of cover – s 65(1), Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] The following appeals are lodged by Mr Cross: (a) ACR 144/22: lodged against the Reviewer’s decision...

5. C Ltd v CZ [2024] NZDT 779 (11 November 2024) [pdf, 387 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 15 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 779 APPLICANT (Counterclaim Respondent) C Ltd RESPONDENT (Counterclaim Applicant) CZ The Tribunal orders: 1. CZ as Trustee of the [the Trust] is to pay to C Ltd the sum of $21,995.09 on or before 3 December 2024. 2. C Ltd is to issue to the [the Trust] an invoice in respect of the balance required for the stone benchtops...

6. Jackman v CAC 10100 & Anderson [2011] NZREADT 30 [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...11 December 2010 the licensee placed an advertisement (for the sale of a residential property) on the internet which listed the licensee’s name as the person whom the public should contact in respect of the sale. The advertisement included the statement: “Brendon Gordon Architect designed the home ...” [4] The appellant complained that Brendon Gordon is not an “architect” and this can be confirmed readily and easily by a search of the New Zealand Architects’ Register. The...

7. Law v CAC 20004 & Fonteyn Developments Ltd [2014] NZREADT 81 [pdf, 36 KB]

   ...units needed to be informed of this and that such purchasers, allegedly, might somehow assume an obligation for the alleged debt. The letter also stated that legal proceedings were on foot for APL to recover the debt from XYDL and Mr Han. This last statement appears to then be incorrect, given that statutory demand proceedings in the High Court had been disposed of with costs orders against APL in October 2012; that APL had filed a notice of discontinuance in the High Court in respect o...

8. IJ v QT LCRO 94 / 2011 (18 January 2012) [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...seems emotions were already running high between Mrs T and the Practitioner’s father. 6 [26] Mrs T’s objection to the Practitioner’s conduct concerned two matters. The first was that he had repeatedly stated he was lawyer, a claim she experienced as intimidation. The second was his threat to call the police. [27] The Practitioner said that he mentioned only once that he was a lawyer, thinking that this information could be helpful in explaining the legal posit...

9. Hawke’s Bay Standards Committee v Hill [2017] NZLCDT 40 [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...against him.” [17] The position is exactly the same with Mr Hill. Mr Collins submitted: “A consequence for a lawyer, having denied culpability in the criminal jurisdiction by pleading ignorance and blaming others, is that the lawyer cannot claim insight and remorse in any meaningful way when that lawyer comes to be judged by his or her profession. In this case, the persistent denials are particularly telling of an experienced solicitor, where he pleaded ignorance of the trust acc...

10. Attorney General - Marlborough Sounds (1998) 5 Te Waipounamu Appellate MB 3 (5 APTW 3) [pdf, 265 KB]

    ...the Court should not prematurely or unnecessarily state a case, and secondly, that the essential merits of the plaintiff's case in public law can be exercised on the s basis ot assumptions. This Court has some reservations as to the latter statement in that any case stated in this present iJlstance, whilst clearly having an impact upon" public la1v", must have its genesis in customary law, a matter which the Maori Land Court and Maori Appellate Court as a specialist...