Piontecki v REAA & Davies [2014] NZREADT 61 [pdf, 71 KB]
...identified that the LIM report was irrelevant and thus not used it in mitigation, it is submitted that it would have reached a different outcome. 27. The second mistake of fact that the Pionteckis submit affected the CAC's decision, was its statement at 4.17 of the decision: "The Committee believes that a more experienced licensee may have included a clause in the sale and purchase agreement requiring due diligence in relation to the SLP, or an acknowledgment that the compl...