Search Results

1. Rautahi - Kaitoki 2C2B (2004) 178 Napier MB 26 (178 NA 26) [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...that case the Court found that term "beneficial owners" extends to all those persons who can satisfy the Court, either at law or in equity, that they are entitled to an interest in the land. There are eight persons of Maori descent who can claim beneficial ownership to this land. The requirement in section 133(3)(a)/93 is therefore met. Section 133(3i(b)j93 17. In terms of section 133(3)(b)/93, I note that the beneficial owners of the land have all been notified of the propos...

2. Panapa - Ngawhare rāua ko Merepapuha Raukura Maika Te Rangipuawhe Whānau Trust (2017) 159 Waiariki MB 277 (159 WAR 277) [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...share of the interests should be vested in the Frank and Ngarangimihi Maika whānau trust. Taimona Panapa’s submissions [8] The applicant believes that the Whānau trust is not being administered for the benefit of all beneficiaries. He claims that his whānau currently gains very little benefit from the trust, while Huru Maika’s whānau benefits significantly. [9] The applicant submits that Huru Maika’s whānau benefit through work undertaken on the bach which they occup...

3. INZ (Calder) v Wong [2019] NZIACDT 55 (5 August 2019) sanctions [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...penalty of seven years imprisonment and a fine of $100,000. [14] It is submitted that the imposition of the sanctions should reflect Parliament’s intention in respect of Mr Wong’s behaviour. He provided inaccurate information and dishonest statements on more than one occasion to Immigration New Zealand, the Authority and the Tribunal. A punitive sanction would be appropriate. [15] Mr Wong took advantage of vulnerable clients with language difficulties who would have had diff...

4. Williams v Pukahukiwi Kaokaoroa 2 Inc - Pukahukiwi Kaokaoroa 2 Inc (2023) 295 Waiariki MB 97 (295 WAR 97) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...“open” for inspection by shareholders and the public, the law is silent as to whether Parliament intended that this should apply to the whole register or simply the personal information held about the person who is requesting access. The respondent claims 295 Waiariki MB 101 wording does not require that the whole register be made available, so their approach of providing an excerpt is in line with the legislative requirements. [18] The respondent submits that s 56 of the...

5. 09.10.-Kim-Tahiwi-and-Rawiri-Rikihana-Nga-hapu-o-Otaki-draft-evidence-3.07.23-BF-tracked-changes.PDF [PDF, 255 KB]

   ...process should refrain from entering into any discussions that might interfere with the Project Partners' ability to work through issues in a mana enhancing way. This includes any matters that might otherwise be dealt with through the Treaty claims process. Any attempt to do so has the potential to de-rail our ability to form a strong partnership and our ability to reach consensus. This is turn would have consequences for the future of the Project. 20. At the time of writi...

6. [2024] NZIACDT 18 – KL v Lawlor (24 May 2024) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...sanctions pursuant to s 51 of the Act. [42] A timetable is set out below. Any request for repayment of fees or the payment of costs or expenses or for compensation must be accompanied by a schedule particularising the amounts and basis of the claim, together with supporting documents such as receipts. Mr Lawlor’s disciplinary history will be taken into account in assessing the sanctions. Timetable [43] The timetable for submissions will be as follows: (1) The Registrar, the...

7. Wainui v Wainui - Part 1 Deposited Plan 3413 (2024) 127 Tairawhiti MB 150 (127 TRW 150) [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...boundary and the Whānau Homestead is in close proximity to the Mangatu River. [8] Based on the materials provided to the Court it appears that2: (a) The Whānau Home is owned separately to the Land, i.e. Mangatu Incorporation does not own, or claim to own, the Whānau Home; (b) Tipene Puru may have purchased the Whānau Home from Mangatu Incorporation on 8 July 1966; and (c) the part of the Land on which the Whānau Home is located was previously subject to a lease dated 27...

8. Chadwick v Guardian Trust and Executors Co Ltd - Ngatarawa 2E1 (1964) 3 Ikaroa Appellate Court MB 32 (3 APT 32) [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...comi,enaation. By notice dated 10th June 1964 Mr Chadwick gave notice of appeal and by notice dated 12th June 1964 the Guardian Trust company did likewise though both were filed in Court on the 15th June 1964 and registered in reverse order. A statement o:f" more explicit grounds of al)peal was later lodged by the sol1c1 tors :f'or Mr Chadwi.ck. ~he appeal and cross-appeal were heard by this Court on 1st September 1964 at Napier an:l in terms of an arrangement made_ Dy coun...

9. J v New Zealand Law Society [2012] NZLCDT 27 [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...of cases undertaken previously, while a barrister for over 6 years. Thus he did not support his bare assertions of competence by evidence which could be tested. When cross-examined about areas of expertise, he stated the only area in which he claimed expert status, as opposed to competence, was defamation. On further questioning it transpired that his actual experience in this field was as a litigant in person before he was a qualified lawyer, in 1993, and one other case in 2004....

10. Directory of Official Information V-Z [pdf, 1.2 MB]

    ...development programmes include Hauora Māori values and concepts, and that Tikanga Māori is respected within the organisation. Records Records held by Wairarapa DHB include medical records, financial records, planning documents (Strategic Plan, Statement of Intent, Annual Plan, etc), various specialist strategic plans, HR records, papers and minutes for board and sub-committees, correspondence, internal memorandum, minutes and papers of various operational committees, contracts, repor...