Eichelbaum report [pdf, 441 KB]
...was revisited in Judgment No 6, 23 April 1993. The Crown argued that the playing of tapes should proceed on the basis that tapes not containing allegations relevant to the charges should be treated as if they were 12 contradictory or inconsistent statements. Their playing should be restricted to situations where the witness, upon being cross-examined, either denied the previous statement, or did not distinctly admit the fact of the prior statement. Counsel for Mr Ellis on the other han...