Search Results

1. [2006] NZEmpC AC 47/06 Cliff & Groom v Air NZ Ltd [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...Groom got to read the letter about the meeting the next morning, he understood it to mean that the company had reduced its inquiry to one website, the bikini.com. This was because the letter said that the company had further investigated certain claims he had made that referred to the marital problems and looking into sites to find women’s lingerie. It said that the sample check had been conducted on the bikini.com which had revealed sites of bikinis and male thongs, an image ga...

2. Recommendations recap - issue 5 [pdf, 1 MB]

   Recommendations recap A summary of coronial recommendations and comments made between 1 October–31 March 2013 Issue 5 Published by the Ministry of Justice ISSN 2253-5152 Disclaimer This publication has been produced by the research counsel of the Office of the Chief Coroner. The best effort has been made to accurately summarise the circumstances, findings and recommendations made by the coroner in each case – despite this, these are not exact replications of coronial findings. T

3. ENV-2016-AKL-000xxx Zakara Investments Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 23 MB]

   Notice of Appeal by Zakara Investments Limited against decisions on the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Dated: 16 September 2016 REFERENCE: Catherine Somerville-Frost (Catherine.Somerville-Frost@chapmantripp.com) Nicola de Wit (Nicola.deWit@chapmantripp.com) In the Environment Court of New Zealand at Auckland ENV-2016-AKL- in the matter of: the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Managem

4. LCRO 103/2021 & LCRO 58/2022, LCRO 104/2021 and LCRO 105/2021 GS v ABC Ltd & HY, [Law Firm A] v ABC Ltd & HY and SW v [Area] Standards Committee [X] (24 November 2022) [pdf, 595 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2022] NZLCRO 126 Ref: LCRO 103/2021 LCRO 058/2022 LCRO 104/2021 LCRO 105/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN GS Applicant AND AND BETWEEN AND AND BETWEEN AND ABC LTD and HY Responden

5. Directory of Official Information M-O [pdf, 511 KB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings M-O About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz ma

6. Directory of Official Information M-O [pdf, 511 KB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings M-O About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz ma

7. ENV-2016-CHC-000071 Affidavit of Mr Nathan Hole [pdf, 3.9 MB]

   ...significant when assessed against the criteria in the District Plan. It was discussed that it may not be significant, but this was never tested as a resource consent was never sought. 21. In 2012 Council was served with a Notice of Proceeding and Statement of Claim filed by Forest and Bird seeking judicial review of the grant of three Certificates issued by me, acting under delegated authority from Council, on 18 December 2008 and 13 February 2009. BF\S6476S98\11 Page 6 22....

8. [2011] NZEmpC 3 Northland DHB and 20 Others v New Zealand Resident Doctors Association Inc [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...high ground in setting the bargaining agenda. [74] Had it been necessary, this would have been an appropriate case in which to have validated any error by applying s 219 of the Act. [75] For the foregoing reasons I dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims challenging the lawfulness of the defendant’s initiation of collective bargaining. Postscript [76] That the Union’s rules do not appear to have been revised (at least comprehensively) to take account of the current Act, is ill...

9. CAC304 v Morris [2016] NZREADT 4 [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...is signed by Mr J Massam seemingly on behalf of the trustees, and by William Hughes Ltd as lessee; and Mr Morris has signed as guarantor. Accordingly, he submits we cannot regard the lease as a fiction. [44] Mr Parmenter notes that the Committee claims the lease to be a sham because no payments were made pursuant to it. He notes that Cawthray Motors Ltd had come on the scene by 23 May 2012 when, as covered above, Mr J Massam wrote to BNZ. He puts it that it seems that the subject of M...

10. Wells & Anor v REAA CAC 20007 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 36 [pdf, 83 KB]

    ...sought by the complainants. The licensee seeks a further hearing should we find his conduct to have been deficient. The Authority agrees that this would be an appropriate course. [39] As stated above, the Authority submits that some of the losses claimed by the appellants would not be recoverable by orders available under s.93 of the Act. 6 A Summary of Material Evidence The Evidence for the Appellants [40] Ms Wells (one of the vendor-appellants) covered the basic facts...