Wall v Fairfax New Zealand Ltd [2017] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 1.1 MB]
...“threatening, abusive or insulting”, being matter “likely to excite hostility against or bring into contempt any group of persons in New Zealand on the ground of the colour, race, or ethnic or national origins of that group of persons”. [29] In her statement of claim Ms Wall has elected to allege the two cartoons were “insulting and likely to bring into contempt” Māori and Pacifika people. We determine the case on that basis. Two of the central allegations are: [29.1] In...