7294 items matching your search terms
ROBERT RICHARD GREENSLADE v JETSTAR AIRWAYS LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 23 [14 February] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 23 ARC 91/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ROBERT RICHARD GREENSLADE Plaintiff AND JETSTAR AIRWAYS LIMITED Defendant Hearing: Court: 6-7 May 2013 Chief Judge G L Colgan Judge Christina Inglis Judge M E
...the applicants have not as yet provided sufficient evidence to prove that an error was made in the presentation of facts at the time the orders were made. 2025 Chief Judge's MB 1411 28. To assist the Court in establishing the errors claimed, it is recommended that the applicants file documentary evidence that records the names of the parents of Pau-te- awa Tuari and Kataraina Tuari and particularly the name of their father. Examples of documentary evidence to provide in...
...public. [43] If Mr TG was going to lose his temper with anyone, which he plainly did, he should never have done that in court, even less so when a judge was present. However, the audio also suggested Mr TG was vacillating, which supports his claim that he was not sure whether to sit or stand. That is an important point because it is consistent with his assertion that he genuinely did not know what to do, and did not intend any disrespect to the Judge. [44] There can be no doub...
...corralling all development within the RUB and suggest the development of unserviced satellite villages in the countryside which would accommodate I 2 up to 3000 residents with access to larger centres. MAORI HISTORICAL, CULTURAL, ME.TAPHYSICAL, CLAIMS & CONTROL • There Is considerable disillusionment and concern in the Ratepayers over the influence Maori, "Manu whenua" (MW) are being granted in the Unitary Plan as it stands. Virtually every section of the PAUP has detai...
...must consider all relevant matters, including any matters that indicate the intention of the persons; and 1 Leota v Parcel Express Ltd [2020] NZEmpC 61, [2020] ERNZ 164. 2 At [54]. (b) is not to treat as a determining matter any statement by the persons that describes the nature of their relationship. … [6] As s 6(2) makes clear, the task for the Court is to determine the real nature of the relationship. As s 6(3) makes clear, the mutual intention of the parties...
...and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 25 February 2022. [2] Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties resolved all matters in issue and the Tribunal is asked to make a consent declaration. The parties have filed: [2.1] A Statement of Claim dated 24 February 2022. [2.2] A Consent Memorandum dated 24 February 2022. [2.3] An Agreed Summary of Facts, a copy of which is annexed and marked ‘A’. [3] In the Consent Memorandum dated 24 February 2022 the parties req...
...strike notices, the issue is still of importance for the future. Leave is granted on this issue. [31] As to the second question,34 we consider that this can be read as an alternative basis for the Chief Judge’s finding rather than an obiter statement. This issue is also one of such general or public importance as to merit the attention of this Court. Leave is granted on this issue. [32] The issue of whether the compliance notice could be issued to the workers35 only arises i...
...1/36 Identification of evidence that may be of assistance in remedying the mistake or omission 15. The applicant has provided the following documents in support of this section 45 application: (a) Email document setting out critical statements of the applicant and the Karepe/Cribb whānau land blocks for succession. Received 28 March 2024. (b) Additional research document on descendants of Te One John Hoani Karepe. Received 8 June 2020. (c) Research document undert...
...serves to enable choices for future land use, development and protection. [25] In addition to s32, RMA, other matters for consideration include the provisions of pt 2, the territorial authority's functions (under s31, RMA) and national policy statements (s74(1) RMA). However, no party contends that the PDP does not fully and properly account for those considerations. Therefore, we do not report separately on them in our findings. [26] Those matters were largely uncontentiou...
...Bosley) and from Mr Moffat the 14 college’s property manager. Mr Parker put it that the information from those two persons seemed in some ways at odds with the conceptual development plan but can be regarded as confirming Mr Moffat’s statements to the defendant, that the plan represented the outer limits of possible development. Mr Parker also put it that, generally speaking, the playing fields adjoining Scaife Place have been preserved for the benefit of that property’s...