KL v WS LCRO 160/2013 (15 June 2016) [pdf, 89 KB]
...Committee concluded that Ms WS’s fees were fair and reasonable for the services she had provided. 3 Application for review [7] Mr KL disagrees with the Standards Committee decision and considers it contained a number of incorrect factual statements in relation to the progression of his trial. He also considers that it was wrong for the Committee to ignore the costs assessor’s report when reaching its decision that the costs charged were fair and reasonable. In addition...